صديقي ركز في الكلام هنا ,,,,While the range performance of the 9M82M/ME and 9M83M/ME missiles against aerial targets is not as good as the contemporary S-400 / SA-21 40N6 missile ....لكن بعكس قدراته في صد الصواريخ الباليستية the 9M82M/ME matches the kinematic range of the S-400 / SA-21 48N6E3, and outperforms the S-300PMU2 Favorit / SA-20B 48N6E2 missile, and all earlier 48N6 series missiles. In terms of performance against ballistic targets .......
اخي الكلام هنا عن ان المنظومة اقل في المدى من الاس400
ولم يقل احد ابدا انها مماثلة لها في المدى
لكن اين الكلام عن انها اقل من الاس 300 pmu2 في القدرة على المناورة
انا ساعطيك كلام مباشر على قدرة المنظومة ضد الطائرات
ومازلت اطالبك بمصدر لاختلاف قدرات المناورة بين صاروخي المنظومة
It is important to note that no F/A-18 variant, nor the Joint Strike Fighter, were designed to penetrate the coverage of the S-300V/VM systems. The survivability of these aircraft will not be significantly better than that of legacy combat aircraft
The highly mobile Antey S-300V and S-300VM remain one of the most lethal area defence SAM systems ever developed, firing hypersonic missiles designed to engage aircraft, cruise missiles and ballistic missiles
Rapidly deployable, high survivable, and highly lethal, these weapons are especially difficult to counter and require significant capabilities to robustly defeat. The US Air Force currently envisages the F-22A Raptor as the primary weapon used to defeat these capable systems