- إنضم
- 5 مايو 2008
- المشاركات
- 6,659
- التفاعل
رد: عقيدة السعودية دفاعيه ام هجومية ؟؟؟
المشكلة ان عمان مخترقة من عدة جهات استخبارية عالمية وليست الهندية فقط
المشكلة ان عمان مخترقة من عدة جهات استخبارية عالمية وليست الهندية فقط
عقيدة السعودية دفاعيه ام هجومية ؟؟؟
- بادئ الموضوع النمر العربي
- تاريخ البدء
- إنضم
- 5 مايو 2008
- المشاركات
- 6,659
- التفاعل
رد: عقيدة السعودية دفاعيه ام هجومية ؟؟؟
ههههههههههههههههههههه
هي تقارير كثيرة جدا جدا
نحن نعلم من اين تأكل الكتف
ولو اردت التقارير انا مستعد
ان اردت الاقتناع فاهلا وسهلا
لم تقتنع فهو شانك انت
ههههههههههههههههههههه
هي تقارير كثيرة جدا جدا
نحن نعلم من اين تأكل الكتف
ولو اردت التقارير انا مستعد
ان اردت الاقتناع فاهلا وسهلا
لم تقتنع فهو شانك انت
- إنضم
- 5 مايو 2008
- المشاركات
- 6,659
- التفاعل
رد: عقيدة السعودية دفاعيه ام هجومية ؟؟؟
http://www.9abc.net/index.php/archives/2293
يهمنا في هذا التقرير التالي :
news reports speculated that China has offered to sell Saudi Arabia advanced missile systems, of which 600 km range CSS-6 missiles and a range of 1800 km, using solid fuel CSS-5 missiles; also may be a range of 5500 km of intercontinental ballistic missiles, because it basically added a booster of CSS-2. It is said that the Saudi Defense Ministe
وهو يتحدث عن ان السعودية اضافت لترسانتها CSS-5 بمدى 5500كلم وCSS-6 بمدى 600كلم
هذا غير الصواريخ القديمة من CSS-2
ويتكلم التقرير ايضا عن توافق ايراني امريكي لمنع السعودية من التعاون مع باكستان والصين وكوريا
وخوفهم من امتلاك السعودية للرؤوس النووية وغضب امريكي من الصين
وهنا من تقرير اخر :
The Pakistani government reportedly brokered the deal, and it may have also offered to sell Saudi Arabia nuclear warheads for the CSS-2s, which are not accurate enough to deliver conventional warheads effectively.
Pakistan could sell operational nuclear weapons and delivery systems to Saudi Arabia, or it could provide the Saudis with the infrastructure, material, and technical support they need to produce nuclear weapons themselves within a matter of years, as opposed to a decade or longer
http://wiki.debatecoaches.org/2011-2...+Tyler+Salathe
وهذا التقرير يتكلم عن ان باكستان عرضت بيع رؤوس نووية للسعودية
وباكستان مستعدة لتقديم الدعم للسعودية لكي يصنعو رؤوسهم النووية الخاصة في غضون عدة سنوات بانفسهم
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
التقرير الثالث :
Pakistan Piles On The Plutonium
NUCLEAR, BIOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL WEAPONS
July 20, 2011: The U.S. believes that Pakistan is building three more nuclear reactors, to be used to produce plutonium for new nuclear weapons. It is believed that Pakistan has over a hundred nuclear weapons. Two years ago, the U.S. thought that Pakistan had 60 nuclear weapons, and was producing nuclear material for at least 5-6 more bombs a year. That turned out to be an underestimate. Pakistan appears to be increasing its annual production of nuclear weapons. This has created growing fear that one of those weapons could end up in the wrong hands.
The U.S. has provided money and technical assistance to ensure the security of those weapons. It is believed that Pakistan stores its nukes with the nuclear material kept separate from the rest of the weapon (which contains the explosives that compress the plutonium or enriched uranium, causing the nuclear explosion, as well as the electronics and warhead components needed to trigger the explosion.) The Pakistanis also provide layers of security for their nuclear weapons, and do background checks on anyone involved in building, handling or guarding their nukes. Still, there are so many Islamic radical supporters in Pakistan, and the country is so corrupt (as in so many people are for sale or rent) that even the most stringent security efforts are not as effective as they would be in the West (or even China or Russia.) As Pakistan expands its nuclear weapons program, it increases the risk of someone getting away with a nuke, or nuclear material (that could be used for a "dirty bomb" that spreads the nuclear material around using explosives.)
Pakistan built its nuclear weapons in order to provide some protection from Indian invasion and conquest. But India has no interest in conquering Pakistan. That would nearly double the number of Moslems in India, as well as adding an area that has a lot more poverty and corruption. Then there are the Pakistani tribal territories, with over 20 million tribal people who have, for thousands of years, raided into, and occasionally invaded, India. A growing number of Pakistanis are coming to accept this Indian attitude as true, and for the last seven years, the two countries have been negotiating to settle the territorial and political differences that have caused decades of violence (and four wars) between the two nations. Most people, on both sides of the border, agree that a nuclear war would be a tragic disaster for both nations, insuring that neither could claim "victory" with a straight face. But so far there is no peace deal, and Pakistan keeps building more nukes.
Pakistan denies that it is expanding its nuclear arsenal, but U.S. intelligence (and their Indian counterparts) believe otherwise. Sixty weapons should be sufficient to maintain the "balance of terror" with India. What no one wants to discuss openly is the risk of Pakistan selling its "surplus" of nukes to another country. Pakistan certainly needs the money, and already has a track record of peddling nuclear weapons technology. The UN IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) continues investigating Pakistani nuclear weapons scientist A Q Khan's illegal nuclear weapons technology smuggling organization. IAEA believes that Khan's group not only had a wider reach than previously thought, but is still in business. Khan recently showed off a letter from North Korea, discussing a $3.5 million payment for nuclear weapons technology.
Khan is suspected of peddling nuclear secrets as far back as the late 1990s. In 2004, Khan finally admitted it. There was popular outrage in Pakistan at a local politicians suggestion that A Q Khan, who originally stole technology from the West that enabled him to create Pakistan's nuclear bombs, be questioned by foreign police for his role in selling that technology (as a private venture) to other nations (like Libya and North Korea). Khan was placed under house arrest after he confessed, and kept away from journalists, but was otherwise untouchable, because he was a national hero for creating the "Islamic Bomb." Popular demand eventually led to Khan being released from house arrest three years ago.
The IAEA continues to question Khan's customers, some of whom have been very cooperative. It is now known, for example, that most of the nuclear weapons documents provided were in electronic form. Thus the information could be easily copied and distributed. There's no way to track down how many copies there are or who has them. It is known that the documents are not in wide distribution, but it is likely that someone (especially in Iran and North Korea) has copies. But there are indications that the documents are still on the market.
A prime potential customer for Pakistani nukes is Saudi Arabia, which fears increased Iranian aggression once Iran acquires nukes. The Saudis have already bought ballistic missiles from China (which is suspected of supplying Pakistan with some nuclear weapons technology.) Saudi Arabia has the cash to buy nuclear weapons from Pakistan (along with the technology to build a ballistic missile warhead for them). Saudi Arabia would need several dozen nuclear weapons to provide them with an adequate counter to Iranian nukes. This would benefit Pakistan in that Iranian control of Arab oil in the Persian Gulf would put Pakistan at a disadvantage against their Iranian neighbor.
http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htchem/20110720.aspx
ويهمنا هذا الجزئية :
A prime potential customer for Pakistani nukes is Saudi Arabia, which fears increased Iranian aggression once Iran acquires nukes. The Saudis have already bought ballistic missiles from China (which is suspected of supplying Pakistan with some nuclear weapons technology.) Saudi Arabia has the cash to buy nuclear weapons from Pakistan (along with the technology to build a ballistic missile warhead for them). Saudi Arabia would need several dozen nuclear weapons to provide them with an adequate counter to Iranian nukes. This would benefit Pakistan in that Iranian control of Arab oil in the Persian Gulf would put Pakistan at a disadvantage against their Iranian neighbor.
ويتكلم عن بيع باكستان للرؤوس النووية وتركيبها على الصواريخ السعودية
وانها ساعدت السعودية في التكنولوجيا النووية
وهنا حسن خان يتحدث عن العلاقات السعودية الباكستانية وهو مسؤول كبير في الدولة الباكستانية
Saudi Arabia showed great interests to purchase of Pakistani ballistic missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads. Pakistan and Saudi Arabia have information mechanism on different subject.
Pakistan-Saudi Arabia alliance would guarantee larger regional conciliation and stronger ties of survival, production and socio-economic prosperity. Generosity of Saudi Arabia, mediation of Pakistan hold the key of success.
يتكلم عن بيع باكستان لصواريخ باكستانية تستطيع حمل رؤوس نووية
والعلاقات التاريخية والاستراتيجية السعودية وعلاقات حياة او موت
http://www.9abc.net/index.php/archives/2293
يهمنا في هذا التقرير التالي :
news reports speculated that China has offered to sell Saudi Arabia advanced missile systems, of which 600 km range CSS-6 missiles and a range of 1800 km, using solid fuel CSS-5 missiles; also may be a range of 5500 km of intercontinental ballistic missiles, because it basically added a booster of CSS-2. It is said that the Saudi Defense Ministe
وهو يتحدث عن ان السعودية اضافت لترسانتها CSS-5 بمدى 5500كلم وCSS-6 بمدى 600كلم
هذا غير الصواريخ القديمة من CSS-2
ويتكلم التقرير ايضا عن توافق ايراني امريكي لمنع السعودية من التعاون مع باكستان والصين وكوريا
وخوفهم من امتلاك السعودية للرؤوس النووية وغضب امريكي من الصين
وهنا من تقرير اخر :
The Pakistani government reportedly brokered the deal, and it may have also offered to sell Saudi Arabia nuclear warheads for the CSS-2s, which are not accurate enough to deliver conventional warheads effectively.
Pakistan could sell operational nuclear weapons and delivery systems to Saudi Arabia, or it could provide the Saudis with the infrastructure, material, and technical support they need to produce nuclear weapons themselves within a matter of years, as opposed to a decade or longer
http://wiki.debatecoaches.org/2011-2...+Tyler+Salathe
وهذا التقرير يتكلم عن ان باكستان عرضت بيع رؤوس نووية للسعودية
وباكستان مستعدة لتقديم الدعم للسعودية لكي يصنعو رؤوسهم النووية الخاصة في غضون عدة سنوات بانفسهم
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
التقرير الثالث :
Pakistan Piles On The Plutonium
NUCLEAR, BIOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL WEAPONS
July 20, 2011: The U.S. believes that Pakistan is building three more nuclear reactors, to be used to produce plutonium for new nuclear weapons. It is believed that Pakistan has over a hundred nuclear weapons. Two years ago, the U.S. thought that Pakistan had 60 nuclear weapons, and was producing nuclear material for at least 5-6 more bombs a year. That turned out to be an underestimate. Pakistan appears to be increasing its annual production of nuclear weapons. This has created growing fear that one of those weapons could end up in the wrong hands.
The U.S. has provided money and technical assistance to ensure the security of those weapons. It is believed that Pakistan stores its nukes with the nuclear material kept separate from the rest of the weapon (which contains the explosives that compress the plutonium or enriched uranium, causing the nuclear explosion, as well as the electronics and warhead components needed to trigger the explosion.) The Pakistanis also provide layers of security for their nuclear weapons, and do background checks on anyone involved in building, handling or guarding their nukes. Still, there are so many Islamic radical supporters in Pakistan, and the country is so corrupt (as in so many people are for sale or rent) that even the most stringent security efforts are not as effective as they would be in the West (or even China or Russia.) As Pakistan expands its nuclear weapons program, it increases the risk of someone getting away with a nuke, or nuclear material (that could be used for a "dirty bomb" that spreads the nuclear material around using explosives.)
Pakistan built its nuclear weapons in order to provide some protection from Indian invasion and conquest. But India has no interest in conquering Pakistan. That would nearly double the number of Moslems in India, as well as adding an area that has a lot more poverty and corruption. Then there are the Pakistani tribal territories, with over 20 million tribal people who have, for thousands of years, raided into, and occasionally invaded, India. A growing number of Pakistanis are coming to accept this Indian attitude as true, and for the last seven years, the two countries have been negotiating to settle the territorial and political differences that have caused decades of violence (and four wars) between the two nations. Most people, on both sides of the border, agree that a nuclear war would be a tragic disaster for both nations, insuring that neither could claim "victory" with a straight face. But so far there is no peace deal, and Pakistan keeps building more nukes.
Pakistan denies that it is expanding its nuclear arsenal, but U.S. intelligence (and their Indian counterparts) believe otherwise. Sixty weapons should be sufficient to maintain the "balance of terror" with India. What no one wants to discuss openly is the risk of Pakistan selling its "surplus" of nukes to another country. Pakistan certainly needs the money, and already has a track record of peddling nuclear weapons technology. The UN IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) continues investigating Pakistani nuclear weapons scientist A Q Khan's illegal nuclear weapons technology smuggling organization. IAEA believes that Khan's group not only had a wider reach than previously thought, but is still in business. Khan recently showed off a letter from North Korea, discussing a $3.5 million payment for nuclear weapons technology.
Khan is suspected of peddling nuclear secrets as far back as the late 1990s. In 2004, Khan finally admitted it. There was popular outrage in Pakistan at a local politicians suggestion that A Q Khan, who originally stole technology from the West that enabled him to create Pakistan's nuclear bombs, be questioned by foreign police for his role in selling that technology (as a private venture) to other nations (like Libya and North Korea). Khan was placed under house arrest after he confessed, and kept away from journalists, but was otherwise untouchable, because he was a national hero for creating the "Islamic Bomb." Popular demand eventually led to Khan being released from house arrest three years ago.
The IAEA continues to question Khan's customers, some of whom have been very cooperative. It is now known, for example, that most of the nuclear weapons documents provided were in electronic form. Thus the information could be easily copied and distributed. There's no way to track down how many copies there are or who has them. It is known that the documents are not in wide distribution, but it is likely that someone (especially in Iran and North Korea) has copies. But there are indications that the documents are still on the market.
A prime potential customer for Pakistani nukes is Saudi Arabia, which fears increased Iranian aggression once Iran acquires nukes. The Saudis have already bought ballistic missiles from China (which is suspected of supplying Pakistan with some nuclear weapons technology.) Saudi Arabia has the cash to buy nuclear weapons from Pakistan (along with the technology to build a ballistic missile warhead for them). Saudi Arabia would need several dozen nuclear weapons to provide them with an adequate counter to Iranian nukes. This would benefit Pakistan in that Iranian control of Arab oil in the Persian Gulf would put Pakistan at a disadvantage against their Iranian neighbor.
http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htchem/20110720.aspx
ويهمنا هذا الجزئية :
A prime potential customer for Pakistani nukes is Saudi Arabia, which fears increased Iranian aggression once Iran acquires nukes. The Saudis have already bought ballistic missiles from China (which is suspected of supplying Pakistan with some nuclear weapons technology.) Saudi Arabia has the cash to buy nuclear weapons from Pakistan (along with the technology to build a ballistic missile warhead for them). Saudi Arabia would need several dozen nuclear weapons to provide them with an adequate counter to Iranian nukes. This would benefit Pakistan in that Iranian control of Arab oil in the Persian Gulf would put Pakistan at a disadvantage against their Iranian neighbor.
ويتكلم عن بيع باكستان للرؤوس النووية وتركيبها على الصواريخ السعودية
وانها ساعدت السعودية في التكنولوجيا النووية
وهنا حسن خان يتحدث عن العلاقات السعودية الباكستانية وهو مسؤول كبير في الدولة الباكستانية
Saudi Arabia showed great interests to purchase of Pakistani ballistic missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads. Pakistan and Saudi Arabia have information mechanism on different subject.
Pakistan-Saudi Arabia alliance would guarantee larger regional conciliation and stronger ties of survival, production and socio-economic prosperity. Generosity of Saudi Arabia, mediation of Pakistan hold the key of success.
يتكلم عن بيع باكستان لصواريخ باكستانية تستطيع حمل رؤوس نووية
والعلاقات التاريخية والاستراتيجية السعودية وعلاقات حياة او موت
- إنضم
- 5 مايو 2008
- المشاركات
- 6,659
- التفاعل
رد: عقيدة السعودية دفاعيه ام هجومية ؟؟؟
اتفضل ده ياعم برضة ولا تزعلش
تقرير من جلوبال سيكيورتي
More recently, Saudi officials have discussed the procurement of new Pakistani intermediate-range missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads.
في الآونة الأخيرة، ناقش المسؤولون السعوديون شراء صواريخ جديدة متوسطة المدى من باكستان قادرة على حمل رؤوس نووي
While there is no direct evidence that Saudi Arabia has chosen a nuclear option, the Saudis have in place a foundation for building a nuclear deterrent
في حين ليس هناك دليل مباشر على أن المملكة العربية السعودية اختارت الخيار النووي، والسعوديون لديهم مكان الأساس لبناء رادع نووي.
Saudi Arabia first opened a nuclear research center in the desert military complex at Al-Suleiyel, near Al-Kharj, in 1975
المملكة العربية السعودية افتتح أول مركز للبحوث النووية في الصحراء مجمع عسكري في المنطقة الصحراوية (السليل ) بالقرب من الخرج 1975.
Saudi military and nuclear experts were co-operating closely. Saudi nuclear scientists were sent to Baghdad for months of training.
وهنا يتكلم عن خبراء عسكريين سعوديين نووين كانو يتعاونون مع العلماء العراقيين تعاون وثيق جدا
Saudi Arabian officials went to Pakistan and are negotiating the purchase of nuclear warheads for their land-based missiles," head of Israel Defense Forces' Military Intelligence Maj.-Gen. Aharon Ze'evi reportedly told the Knesset's Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee on 21 October 2003. Committee chairman MK Yuval Shteinitz said this was the first time he had heard a report about Saudi Arabia's nuclear plans. "There is an assumption that Saudi Arabia financed the Pakistan nuclear plant and that there is a tacit understanding between the two countries that, if Iran becomes nuclear, Saudi Arabia will be provided with some nuclear warheads from Pakistan," Shteinitz said
وهنا المفيد ان المملكة حصلت على رؤو سنووية وصواريخ من باكستان
http://www.9abc.net/index.php/archives/2293
يهمنا في هذا التقرير التالي :
news reports speculated that China has offered to sell Saudi Arabia advanced missile systems, of which 600 km range CSS-6 missiles and a range of 1800 km, using solid fuel CSS-5 missiles; also may be a range of 5500 km of intercontinental ballistic missiles, because it basically added a booster of CSS-2. It is said that the Saudi Defense Ministe
وهو يتحدث عن ان السعودية اضافت لترسانتها CSS-5 بمدى 5500كلم وCSS-6 بمدى 600كلم
هذا غير الصواريخ القديمة من CSS-2
ويتكلم التقرير ايضا عن توافق ايراني امريكي لمنع السعودية من التعاون مع باكستان والصين وكوريا
وخوفهم من امتلاك السعودية للرؤوس النووية وغضب امريكي من الصين
وهنا من تقرير اخر :
The Pakistani government reportedly brokered the deal, and it may have also offered to sell Saudi Arabia nuclear warheads for the CSS-2s, which are not accurate enough to deliver conventional warheads effectively.
Pakistan could sell operational nuclear weapons and delivery systems to Saudi Arabia, or it could provide the Saudis with the infrastructure, material, and technical support they need to produce nuclear weapons themselves within a matter of years, as opposed to a decade or longer
http://wiki.debatecoaches.org/2011-2...+Tyler+Salathe
وهذا التقرير يتكلم عن ان باكستان عرضت بيع رؤوس نووية للسعودية
وباكستان مستعدة لتقديم الدعم للسعودية لكي يصنعو رؤوسهم النووية الخاصة في غضون عدة سنوات بانفسهم
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
التقرير الثالث :
Pakistan Piles On The Plutonium
NUCLEAR, BIOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL WEAPONS
July 20, 2011: The U.S. believes that Pakistan is building three more nuclear reactors, to be used to produce plutonium for new nuclear weapons. It is believed that Pakistan has over a hundred nuclear weapons. Two years ago, the U.S. thought that Pakistan had 60 nuclear weapons, and was producing nuclear material for at least 5-6 more bombs a year. That turned out to be an underestimate. Pakistan appears to be increasing its annual production of nuclear weapons. This has created growing fear that one of those weapons could end up in the wrong hands.
The U.S. has provided money and technical assistance to ensure the security of those weapons. It is believed that Pakistan stores its nukes with the nuclear material kept separate from the rest of the weapon (which contains the explosives that compress the plutonium or enriched uranium, causing the nuclear explosion, as well as the electronics and warhead components needed to trigger the explosion.) The Pakistanis also provide layers of security for their nuclear weapons, and do background checks on anyone involved in building, handling or guarding their nukes. Still, there are so many Islamic radical supporters in Pakistan, and the country is so corrupt (as in so many people are for sale or rent) that even the most stringent security efforts are not as effective as they would be in the West (or even China or Russia.) As Pakistan expands its nuclear weapons program, it increases the risk of someone getting away with a nuke, or nuclear material (that could be used for a "dirty bomb" that spreads the nuclear material around using explosives.)
Pakistan built its nuclear weapons in order to provide some protection from Indian invasion and conquest. But India has no interest in conquering Pakistan. That would nearly double the number of Moslems in India, as well as adding an area that has a lot more poverty and corruption. Then there are the Pakistani tribal territories, with over 20 million tribal people who have, for thousands of years, raided into, and occasionally invaded, India. A growing number of Pakistanis are coming to accept this Indian attitude as true, and for the last seven years, the two countries have been negotiating to settle the territorial and political differences that have caused decades of violence (and four wars) between the two nations. Most people, on both sides of the border, agree that a nuclear war would be a tragic disaster for both nations, insuring that neither could claim "victory" with a straight face. But so far there is no peace deal, and Pakistan keeps building more nukes.
Pakistan denies that it is expanding its nuclear arsenal, but U.S. intelligence (and their Indian counterparts) believe otherwise. Sixty weapons should be sufficient to maintain the "balance of terror" with India. What no one wants to discuss openly is the risk of Pakistan selling its "surplus" of nukes to another country. Pakistan certainly needs the money, and already has a track record of peddling nuclear weapons technology. The UN IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) continues investigating Pakistani nuclear weapons scientist A Q Khan's illegal nuclear weapons technology smuggling organization. IAEA believes that Khan's group not only had a wider reach than previously thought, but is still in business. Khan recently showed off a letter from North Korea, discussing a $3.5 million payment for nuclear weapons technology.
Khan is suspected of peddling nuclear secrets as far back as the late 1990s. In 2004, Khan finally admitted it. There was popular outrage in Pakistan at a local politicians suggestion that A Q Khan, who originally stole technology from the West that enabled him to create Pakistan's nuclear bombs, be questioned by foreign police for his role in selling that technology (as a private venture) to other nations (like Libya and North Korea). Khan was placed under house arrest after he confessed, and kept away from journalists, but was otherwise untouchable, because he was a national hero for creating the "Islamic Bomb." Popular demand eventually led to Khan being released from house arrest three years ago.
The IAEA continues to question Khan's customers, some of whom have been very cooperative. It is now known, for example, that most of the nuclear weapons documents provided were in electronic form. Thus the information could be easily copied and distributed. There's no way to track down how many copies there are or who has them. It is known that the documents are not in wide distribution, but it is likely that someone (especially in Iran and North Korea) has copies. But there are indications that the documents are still on the market.
A prime potential customer for Pakistani nukes is Saudi Arabia, which fears increased Iranian aggression once Iran acquires nukes. The Saudis have already bought ballistic missiles from China (which is suspected of supplying Pakistan with some nuclear weapons technology.) Saudi Arabia has the cash to buy nuclear weapons from Pakistan (along with the technology to build a ballistic missile warhead for them). Saudi Arabia would need several dozen nuclear weapons to provide them with an adequate counter to Iranian nukes. This would benefit Pakistan in that Iranian control of Arab oil in the Persian Gulf would put Pakistan at a disadvantage against their Iranian neighbor.
http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htchem/20110720.aspx
ويهمنا هذا الجزئية :
A prime potential customer for Pakistani nukes is Saudi Arabia, which fears increased Iranian aggression once Iran acquires nukes. The Saudis have already bought ballistic missiles from China (which is suspected of supplying Pakistan with some nuclear weapons technology.) Saudi Arabia has the cash to buy nuclear weapons from Pakistan (along with the technology to build a ballistic missile warhead for them). Saudi Arabia would need several dozen nuclear weapons to provide them with an adequate counter to Iranian nukes. This would benefit Pakistan in that Iranian control of Arab oil in the Persian Gulf would put Pakistan at a disadvantage against their Iranian neighbor.
ويتكلم عن بيع باكستان للرؤوس النووية وتركيبها على الصواريخ السعودية
وانها ساعدت السعودية في التكنولوجيا النووية
وهنا حسن خان يتحدث عن العلاقات السعودية الباكستانية وهو مسؤول كبير في الدولة الباكستانية
Saudi Arabia showed great interests to purchase of Pakistani ballistic missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads. Pakistan and Saudi Arabia have information mechanism on different subject.
Pakistan-Saudi Arabia alliance would guarantee larger regional conciliation and stronger ties of survival, production and socio-economic prosperity. Generosity of Saudi Arabia, mediation of Pakistan hold the key of success.
يتكلم عن بيع باكستان لصواريخ باكستانية تستطيع حمل رؤوس نووية
والعلاقات التاريخية والاستراتيجية السعودية وعلاقات حياة او موت
اتفضل ده ياعم برضة ولا تزعلش
تقرير من جلوبال سيكيورتي
More recently, Saudi officials have discussed the procurement of new Pakistani intermediate-range missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads.
في الآونة الأخيرة، ناقش المسؤولون السعوديون شراء صواريخ جديدة متوسطة المدى من باكستان قادرة على حمل رؤوس نووي
While there is no direct evidence that Saudi Arabia has chosen a nuclear option, the Saudis have in place a foundation for building a nuclear deterrent
في حين ليس هناك دليل مباشر على أن المملكة العربية السعودية اختارت الخيار النووي، والسعوديون لديهم مكان الأساس لبناء رادع نووي.
Saudi Arabia first opened a nuclear research center in the desert military complex at Al-Suleiyel, near Al-Kharj, in 1975
المملكة العربية السعودية افتتح أول مركز للبحوث النووية في الصحراء مجمع عسكري في المنطقة الصحراوية (السليل ) بالقرب من الخرج 1975.
Saudi military and nuclear experts were co-operating closely. Saudi nuclear scientists were sent to Baghdad for months of training.
وهنا يتكلم عن خبراء عسكريين سعوديين نووين كانو يتعاونون مع العلماء العراقيين تعاون وثيق جدا
Saudi Arabian officials went to Pakistan and are negotiating the purchase of nuclear warheads for their land-based missiles," head of Israel Defense Forces' Military Intelligence Maj.-Gen. Aharon Ze'evi reportedly told the Knesset's Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee on 21 October 2003. Committee chairman MK Yuval Shteinitz said this was the first time he had heard a report about Saudi Arabia's nuclear plans. "There is an assumption that Saudi Arabia financed the Pakistan nuclear plant and that there is a tacit understanding between the two countries that, if Iran becomes nuclear, Saudi Arabia will be provided with some nuclear warheads from Pakistan," Shteinitz said
وهنا المفيد ان المملكة حصلت على رؤو سنووية وصواريخ من باكستان
- إنضم
- 17 مايو 2010
- المشاركات
- 1,656
- التفاعل
رد: عقيدة السعودية دفاعيه ام هجومية ؟؟؟
رئيس هيئة الأركان العامة الفريق القبيل يقول
«استراتيجية المملكة تتمركز حول الناحية
الدفاعية
http://www.alriyadh.com/2011/06/26/article645229.html
http://www.aawsat.com/details.asp?section=4&article=628286&issueno=11898
قوة الصواريخ هي سلاح ردع وليس هجومي
نفس الطريقة تنطبق على القوة النووية
رئيس هيئة الأركان العامة الفريق القبيل يقول
«استراتيجية المملكة تتمركز حول الناحية
الدفاعية
http://www.alriyadh.com/2011/06/26/article645229.html
http://www.aawsat.com/details.asp?section=4&article=628286&issueno=11898
قوة الصواريخ هي سلاح ردع وليس هجومي
نفس الطريقة تنطبق على القوة النووية
- إنضم
- 5 مايو 2008
- المشاركات
- 6,659
- التفاعل
رد: عقيدة السعودية دفاعيه ام هجومية ؟؟؟
واقعي انا عارف انت زعلان ليه اوي كده عشان الصورة هذي صح
واقعي انا عارف انت زعلان ليه اوي كده عشان الصورة هذي صح
- إنضم
- 5 مايو 2008
- المشاركات
- 6,659
- التفاعل
رد: عقيدة السعودية دفاعيه ام هجومية ؟؟؟
جدا واقعي راجع هذه المواضيع وتفهم كيف تسير الامور
http://defense-arab.com/vb/showthread.php?t=10628
http://defense-arab.com/vb/showthread.php?t=38565
http://defense-arab.com/vb/showthread.php?t=38336
http://defense-arab.com/vb/showthread.php?t=45686
http://defense-arab.com/vb/showthread.php?t=52603
http://defense-arab.com/vb/showthread.php?t=59489
http://defense-arab.com/vb/showthread.php?t=58795
لم نتكلم من فراغ
جدا واقعي راجع هذه المواضيع وتفهم كيف تسير الامور
http://defense-arab.com/vb/showthread.php?t=10628
http://defense-arab.com/vb/showthread.php?t=38565
http://defense-arab.com/vb/showthread.php?t=38336
http://defense-arab.com/vb/showthread.php?t=45686
http://defense-arab.com/vb/showthread.php?t=52603
http://defense-arab.com/vb/showthread.php?t=59489
http://defense-arab.com/vb/showthread.php?t=58795
لم نتكلم من فراغ
- إنضم
- 31 أكتوبر 2010
- المشاركات
- 2,567
- التفاعل
سؤال يطرح نفسه
ليش مافيه استعراض عسكري في السعودية ؟
العرض العسكري قطر
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTaLCbfdosc
العرض العسكري الاماراتي
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTxoOFqkuEs
العرض العسكري العماني
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQhQYgKTO6E
العرض العسكري البحرين
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XVLwScAoYuA
العرض العسكري الكويتي
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwtWJEVe4V0
بعد الاستعراض الي نشوفه في كل مكان في الخليج وغير الخليج وين العرض العسكري للقوات السعوديه
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ievKpVQt4Nk
الي شفته في السعوديه باسم عرض عسكري هو عرض قوة امن الحج قبل الحج
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ievKpVQt4Nk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTxoOFqkuEs
ممكن تفسير لعدم العرض العسكري وهل فيه عروض عسكريه كانت تقام او فيه استعراض عسكري صار وهل فيه نيه لعمل عرض عسكري واذا لا فوش السر في عدم العرض والدول كلها قاعده تستعرض زي ماشفنا في دول الخليج وفي كل دوله
ليش مافيه استعراض عسكري في السعودية ؟
العرض العسكري قطر
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTaLCbfdosc
العرض العسكري الاماراتي
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTxoOFqkuEs
العرض العسكري العماني
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQhQYgKTO6E
العرض العسكري البحرين
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XVLwScAoYuA
العرض العسكري الكويتي
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwtWJEVe4V0
بعد الاستعراض الي نشوفه في كل مكان في الخليج وغير الخليج وين العرض العسكري للقوات السعوديه
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ievKpVQt4Nk
الي شفته في السعوديه باسم عرض عسكري هو عرض قوة امن الحج قبل الحج
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ievKpVQt4Nk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTxoOFqkuEs
ممكن تفسير لعدم العرض العسكري وهل فيه عروض عسكريه كانت تقام او فيه استعراض عسكري صار وهل فيه نيه لعمل عرض عسكري واذا لا فوش السر في عدم العرض والدول كلها قاعده تستعرض زي ماشفنا في دول الخليج وفي كل دوله
- إنضم
- 2 أكتوبر 2010
- المشاركات
- 11,162
- التفاعل
- الدولة
رد: عقيدة السعودية دفاعيه ام هجومية ؟؟؟
## اخي تايفوووون ....... هل تستطيع ان تحظر لي عرضا عسكريا امريكيا واحدا ........ بينما في المقابل ....... ستمل من كثرة العروض العسكرية الروسية (( السوفيتية )) ...... افهم يافهيم ##
## اخي تايفوووون ....... هل تستطيع ان تحظر لي عرضا عسكريا امريكيا واحدا ........ بينما في المقابل ....... ستمل من كثرة العروض العسكرية الروسية (( السوفيتية )) ...... افهم يافهيم ##
- إنضم
- 6 أكتوبر 2010
- المشاركات
- 554
- التفاعل
رد: عقيدة السعودية دفاعيه ام هجومية ؟؟؟
عقيدة السعودية دفاعية بحته
وجميع أسلحتها هي للردع وصد العدوان
وهذا ما يؤكده قادة البلاد ويكررونه في كثير من المناسبات
والكلمة المشهورة عندهم " نحن لا نعتدي على أحد ولكنا لا نرضى أن يعتدي أحد على شبر من أرض المملكة "
حتى وإن كانت الأسلحة هجومية فخير وسيلة للدفاع الهجوم
فليس من المعقول أن تكون كل أسلحتنا تروس ( دروع ) بل لا بد من السيف لحماية الحمى
عقيدة السعودية دفاعية بحته
وجميع أسلحتها هي للردع وصد العدوان
وهذا ما يؤكده قادة البلاد ويكررونه في كثير من المناسبات
والكلمة المشهورة عندهم " نحن لا نعتدي على أحد ولكنا لا نرضى أن يعتدي أحد على شبر من أرض المملكة "
حتى وإن كانت الأسلحة هجومية فخير وسيلة للدفاع الهجوم
فليس من المعقول أن تكون كل أسلحتنا تروس ( دروع ) بل لا بد من السيف لحماية الحمى
- إنضم
- 6 أكتوبر 2010
- المشاركات
- 554
- التفاعل
رد: عقيدة السعودية دفاعيه ام هجومية ؟؟؟
هل تقصد أن الأسلحة الروسية مجرد دعايات رخيصة لأسلحة ضعيفة !!
وش نفهم ؟
هل تقصد أن الأسلحة الروسية مجرد دعايات رخيصة لأسلحة ضعيفة !!
- إنضم
- 22 أبريل 2012
- المشاركات
- 72
- التفاعل
رد: Re: عقيدة السعودية دفاعيه ام هجومية ؟؟؟
" هذا الافضل يكون لا يوجد شي اسمه عرض عسكري لانه في دول تدفع مبالغ ضخمه لـ عرف الاسرار "
السعودية كم عدوهـآ ..؟!
السعودية كم عدوهـآ ..؟!
- إنضم
- 5 مايو 2008
- المشاركات
- 6,659
- التفاعل
رد: Re: عقيدة السعودية دفاعيه ام هجومية ؟؟؟
ومن اخبرك انه لايوجد عروض في السعودية
على العكس هناك عروض عسكرية على مستوى المناطق وهو بشكل دوري ومنتظم
ولكن ماذا نقول عن الاعلام
هذا مقطع فيديو لعرض عسكري عند زيارة الامير سلمان للمنطقة الجنوبية
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPInvLOHYeg&list=UUE1zjJfJliQxbM70ctSelzQ&index=1&feature=plcp
ومن اخبرك انه لايوجد عروض في السعودية
على العكس هناك عروض عسكرية على مستوى المناطق وهو بشكل دوري ومنتظم
ولكن ماذا نقول عن الاعلام
هذا مقطع فيديو لعرض عسكري عند زيارة الامير سلمان للمنطقة الجنوبية
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPInvLOHYeg&list=UUE1zjJfJliQxbM70ctSelzQ&index=1&feature=plcp
- إنضم
- 29 نوفمبر 2011
- المشاركات
- 6,291
- التفاعل
- الدولة
رد: عقيدة السعودية دفاعيه ام هجومية ؟؟؟
عقيده السعوديه فى ظاهرها دفاعيه ولكن الصواريخ و سلاح الجو السعودى هما الاكثر حظا فى الهجوم خصوصا فى ظل تراج السعوديه فى سلاح البحريه
السعوديه تعلم انها قادرة على الحصول على سلاح فى العالم ومنها النووى
ولكن هنا السؤال لماذا السعوديه لاتمتلك تلك الاسلحه مع انها تملك اكثر من مليار مسلم يستطيعوا الدفاع عنها وانقاذ المسلمين فالسعوديه قادرة وبكل سهوله ان تمسح ميانمار مثلا من على الارض وتعتذر ولن يستطيع العالم سوى التنديد
عقيده السعوديه فى ظاهرها دفاعيه ولكن الصواريخ و سلاح الجو السعودى هما الاكثر حظا فى الهجوم خصوصا فى ظل تراج السعوديه فى سلاح البحريه
السعوديه تعلم انها قادرة على الحصول على سلاح فى العالم ومنها النووى
ولكن هنا السؤال لماذا السعوديه لاتمتلك تلك الاسلحه مع انها تملك اكثر من مليار مسلم يستطيعوا الدفاع عنها وانقاذ المسلمين فالسعوديه قادرة وبكل سهوله ان تمسح ميانمار مثلا من على الارض وتعتذر ولن يستطيع العالم سوى التنديد
- إنضم
- 5 مايو 2008
- المشاركات
- 6,659
- التفاعل
رد: عقيدة السعودية دفاعيه ام هجومية ؟؟؟
تخيل مقاتلة تحمل قنابل تقدر بـ13 طن وتسطيع الضرب خلف خطوط العدو وبشكل دقيق
اباتشي بعدد كبير وتكون هجومية بشكل بحت
فرقاطات متقدمة تستطيع ضرب حصار قوي على سواحل العدو
محاولة زيادة اعداد الدبابات بشكل مضظرب وسريع
نقل التقنية للاعتماد على النفس وادخال المؤسسات الخاصة في هذا المجال
الابتعاد عن محاولة الاعتماد على النفط بقدر المستطاع
التهديد بامتلاك النووي في عدة اسابيع
كل هذا وتقول دفاعي بحت
تخيل مقاتلة تحمل قنابل تقدر بـ13 طن وتسطيع الضرب خلف خطوط العدو وبشكل دقيق
اباتشي بعدد كبير وتكون هجومية بشكل بحت
فرقاطات متقدمة تستطيع ضرب حصار قوي على سواحل العدو
محاولة زيادة اعداد الدبابات بشكل مضظرب وسريع
نقل التقنية للاعتماد على النفس وادخال المؤسسات الخاصة في هذا المجال
الابتعاد عن محاولة الاعتماد على النفط بقدر المستطاع
التهديد بامتلاك النووي في عدة اسابيع
كل هذا وتقول دفاعي بحت
- إنضم
- 5 مايو 2008
- المشاركات
- 6,659
- التفاعل
رد: عقيدة السعودية دفاعيه ام هجومية ؟؟؟
الاسلحة الروسيه مجرد خردة من الحديد
تقنيتها ضعيفة بالمقارنه مع الغرب
الاسلحة الروسيه مجرد خردة من الحديد
تقنيتها ضعيفة بالمقارنه مع الغرب
- إنضم
- 5 مايو 2008
- المشاركات
- 6,659
- التفاعل
رد: عقيدة السعودية دفاعيه ام هجومية ؟؟؟
عندنا مثل يقول ماحك جلدك مثل ظفرك
ولنا مع بعض العرب والمسلمين دروس
ولا يلدغ المؤمن من جحرة مرتين
عندنا مثل يقول ماحك جلدك مثل ظفرك
ولنا مع بعض العرب والمسلمين دروس
ولا يلدغ المؤمن من جحرة مرتين