- إنضم
- 14 يونيو 2009
- المشاركات
- 7,650
- التفاعل
- الدولة
الصاروخ الموجه الحديث المضاد للدروع والخاص بالارماتا sokol-1
أخيرا .. الأرماتا من غير أغطية !!!
- بادئ الموضوع anwaralsharrad
- تاريخ البدء
- إنضم
- 30 يونيو 2013
- المشاركات
- 1,199
- التفاعل
الصاروخ الموجه الحديث المضاد للدروع والخاص بالارماتا sokol-1
هل يمكن تزويدها بصواريخ موجهة راداريا ؟
- إنضم
- 20 أبريل 2015
- المشاركات
- 391
- التفاعل
- إنضم
- 30 يونيو 2013
- المشاركات
- 1,199
- التفاعل
- إنضم
- 3 أبريل 2013
- المشاركات
- 5,298
- التفاعل
- إنضم
- 6 ديسمبر 2014
- المشاركات
- 10,359
- التفاعل
- الدولة
- إنضم
- 20 أبريل 2015
- المشاركات
- 391
- التفاعل
- إنضم
- 18 مايو 2013
- المشاركات
- 12,587
- التفاعل
تعطل منصة أرماتا ثانية !!
- إنضم
- 14 يناير 2008
- المشاركات
- 19,147
- التفاعل
- الدولة
اي معدة يمكن ان تتعطل باي لحظة وهذا امر ليس له علاقة بالجاهزية ...............سيارة الرئيس الامريكي )كاديلاك (تعطلت امام احدى السفارات ولم تستطع الحركة
- إنضم
- 6 ديسمبر 2014
- المشاركات
- 10,359
- التفاعل
- الدولة
كلام لا جدال فيه طبعا
انا اشير الى الرغبه الشديده للدفع بمعده لا تزال تطور امام احتقال مهم سيحضره رؤساء كثر تعطلها في الحفل لن يبعث بمضمن جيد على الاقل او اكثر من ذلك من يعلم ...
- إنضم
- 14 يناير 2008
- المشاركات
- 19,147
- التفاعل
- الدولة
اذكر ان هناك حدث مماثل لتعطل الية اثناء عرض عسكري وهو امر ممكن ان يحصل في اي لحظة في اي مكان ...بالتاكيد امر ليس جيد لكنه ممكن ان يحصل وحصل في عروض جوية وسقطت مقاتلات مثل ف117 وسوخوي وغيرها الكثير في عروض جوية ...الحوادث ممكن ان تحصل فجاة لاسباب عديدة لكن لا يمكن ان لا تقوم باشراك معدات حديثة لانها ممكن ان تتعطل
- إنضم
- 15 فبراير 2008
- المشاركات
- 13,443
- التفاعل
الدبابة مازالت فى مراحل التجارب الاولية فموضوع التعطل امر شائع
ومازال امامها وقت حتى ان تنتهى بالكامل ويتم انتاجها
ومن الضرورى ان يتم عرضها فى العرض العسكرى كتسويق لها فى البداية
لكن مصيبة لو تعطلت اثناء العرض
هناك اثنان تعطلا دبابة ومدرعة
ومن الواضح ان هناك مشكلة بالفعل فى المحرك او فى نظام الحركة وليس مجرد عطل عرضي
ومازال امامها وقت حتى ان تنتهى بالكامل ويتم انتاجها
ومن الضرورى ان يتم عرضها فى العرض العسكرى كتسويق لها فى البداية
لكن مصيبة لو تعطلت اثناء العرض
هناك اثنان تعطلا دبابة ومدرعة
ومن الواضح ان هناك مشكلة بالفعل فى المحرك او فى نظام الحركة وليس مجرد عطل عرضي
- إنضم
- 6 ديسمبر 2014
- المشاركات
- 10,359
- التفاعل
- الدولة
الاستاذ انور ذكر انه بالفعل من فترة هنالك مشكله في ناقل الحركه و المصنع قال انها مشكلة مشغلين و المشغلين قالو انه عيب تصنيع!
متفقين جدا
- إنضم
- 14 يونيو 2009
- المشاركات
- 7,650
- التفاعل
- الدولة
- إنضم
- 14 يونيو 2009
- المشاركات
- 7,650
- التفاعل
- الدولة
- إنضم
- 28 مارس 2011
- المشاركات
- 1,155
- التفاعل
افضل ما فعله الروس في هذه الدبابة انهم ابعدو الطاقم عن الملقم الالي متجاوزين اخطر مشكل في الدبابات الروسية ومؤمنين فرص بقاء اكثر لطاقم الدبابة
- إنضم
- 14 يناير 2008
- المشاركات
- 19,147
- التفاعل
- الدولة
The Russian Ministry of Defense today publicly presented the first members of the Armata family of heavy armored vehicles – the T-14 main battle tank and T-15 armored infantry fighting vehicle. The two vehicles are designated to become the spearhead of the armored formations of the Russian Army – replacing the T-72, BMP-2 and MT-LB-based platforms. In Armata-centered formations, these two combat vehicles will be augmented by additional variants that have not yet been unveiled, which could include a combat engineer and counter-mine vehicle (BREM), support platforms mounting automatic cannons, missiles (Terminator) and thermobaric rockets (TOS), self-propelled guns (Coalitzia), bridge layers (MTU), and armored recovery vehicles (ARV).
The 24 Armata platforms shown on the May 9th parade in Moscow are likely to be part of the early production series, some were especially prepared for the parade, according to a Russian MOD tender published in November 2014. Nevertheless, these models represent an innovative ‘clean sheet’ design of an armored vehicle. Although the two vehicles presented have different configurations they also have much in common, as their designers have used common subsystems to simplify training, improve field support and reduce life-cycle cost. These common elements include the suspension system, tracks, drivetrain, and some of the armor and active protection systems. Both vehicles use seven torsion bars with shock absorbers for the rubber-protected road wheels.
The optronics, however, are tailored specifically for each weapon system, and therefore differ considerably in each application. Seating arrangements are also similar, with two crew members seated side-by-side and a third in tandem with the driver in the T-14, and with the commander, in the T-15.
Due to the wide interest in the new Russian armored vehicles we are opening our analysis to all readers. This kind of analysis is regularly provided to subscribers on regular basis. You are invited to join our Gold membership today.
The armor suite used on the T-14 also seems to share some common elements with the T-15. Many of the passive armor modules are similar, if not identical, in some locations. Same concepts are also employed – steel, hybrid and reactive armor, mine countermeasures in front, bar armor protecting the engine compartment and dual active protection system. Both vehicles employ remotely-operated weapon turrets, separating the crew from the armament and ammunition. Both vehicles are operated by a crew of three. The T-15 can also accommodate an infantry squad in the passenger compartment. However, unlike the BMP-2, these soldiers do not have periscopes, firing ports or individual access hatches. Therefore, the infantry squad would come into effect only after dismounting.
The crew seating arrangement in the T-14. The commander is in the right side position, the driver in the left and gunner in the position with closed hatch behind the driver. The turret must be turned sideways to enable the gunner to open his hatch. It is likely that in emergency he can escape from the driver’s hatch. The muzzle reference measurement unit is clearly seen on the barrel base. Photo: Andrey Kryuchenko
The Armata platform is configured with an active mine countermeasure system, designed to detect or trigger mines ahead of the tank. The system is mounted on the lower front edge of the vehicle. Photo: vitaly-Kuzmin
The current turret mounts a 125mm smooth bore cannon, without a coaxial weapon (previous reports indicated it had a 30mm coaxial gun and 7.62mm machine gun). While the turret has a distinctive shape dictated by the panels covering its various systems, its basic structure is likely to be thinner, providing a framework for a modular weapon system that could also support cannons of various calibers, automatic mortars or other support weapons.
Subscribe for more info
The shrouded 125mm cannon is different from previous models used on the T-90 and T-72. The main difference is the absence of a bore evacuator (since the gun compartment is separate from the crew compartment, extracting the combustion gasses from the gun is not necessary for crew safety.) A small box likely to be a gun reference system is located above the gun, providing exact measurement of barrel deformations for ballistic calculation (13). A meteorological mast is also located on the turret of the T-14, or the rear section on T-15 (10), feeding data to the ballistic computer.
An elevated view of the new T-15 BMP, based on the Armata chassis. The mine countermeasures at the lower front area is clearly seen. Photo: Vitaly Kuzmin
The T-15 uses an ‘off the shelf’ KBP EPOCH turret, also used on the Kurganets-25 BMP. This turret integrates a single 30mm cannon with 500 rounds (AP/HE), a 7.62mm coaxial machine gun, four Kornet-EM missiles (two on each side), and two fire control systems, integrating electro-optical sights, a laser rangefinder and laser guidance system (for the Kornets). The two systems are contained in ballistic protected modules, adding resilience to this combat vehicle. (6, 9)
A 7.62mm machine gun is mounted on the remotely-operated weapon station, integrated with what seems to be the independent, panoramic sight of the commander. (2) The gunner’s main sight (4) is located in a protected cell to the right of the main gun, enabling the gunner and commander to engage different targets.
Additional weapons could be introduced in an alternative turret design; the current one lacks the installation for such weapons. A compartment located above the gun could provide space for an additional weapon assembly mounted above the gun.
(1, 7) The T-14 turret also houses two active protection systems, comprising the Afghanit hard-kill APS (five launch tubes recessed at the turret base), and four soft-kill countermeasure launchers – two are positioned on rotating pedestals and two are pointing upwards (3, 10). These are likely to launch salvos of projectiles instantly creating a thick, multi-spectral smoke screens designed to defeat guided missiles, laser and targeting systems by blocking infrared, visible light and millimeter-wave radar radiation. These soft-kill countermeasures are designed to protect the vehicle from 3rd and 4th generation missiles such as direct attack Hellfire, TOW and BILL, or Brimstone, JAGM, Javelin or Spike missiles, approaching at high trajectory, as well as from nearly vertical top-attack by sensor-fused weapons (SFW).
A total of 10 Afghanit canisters are used, five on each side of the turret. When the turret points forward, they protect the forward arc (about 60 degrees on each side). When a threat coming from the sides or rear is detected, the turret will automatically slew toward the threat, enabling the APS to launch. Lacking this turntable function, T-15 uses the same five tubes in fixed positions, on both sides of the vehicle, covering only the forward arc. The tube objects are seemingly a smaller, more efficient evolution of the Drozd ‘explosive screen’. Afghanit is likely employing these countermeasures at close range, neutralizing incoming threats before they hit the tank armor. A previous version of APS from Russia, the Arena, employed an explosive ‘cassette’ launched above the incoming threat, firing a screen of blast and fragments downward.
Each of the APSs has its own sensors as well, mounted on each side of the turret, covering the rear and front quadrants left and right. The sensor (5) coupled with the pedestalled and upward pointing fixed countermeasures seems to be covered by a flat panel. There are four such sensors on each vehicle (T-14, T-15), providing hemispheric coverage, thus detecting potential top attack threats before they enter a lethal zone (SFW).
Although the two designs share the same suspension and drive train, the layout of those systems is different. Both have seven road wheels, four suspension idlers and steel tracks. The T-14 has the engine mounted in the rear section, with a rear sprocket and front tension wheel. This design places the main weapon system in the center and the crew in the front for best visibility. The T-15 has its engine in the front, with the sprocket pulling its tracks also placed in the front and a tension wheel at the rear. This design clears space for the infantry squad at the rear and also adds some protection up front.
Serving the engine with air intakes, cooling and exhaust require special armor adaptations. The T-14 uses a slat armor (11) to protect the engine compartment from RPGs, leaving the necessary space for air intake and exhaust. The T-15 uses a skirt (8) of oblique armor panels covering the exhaust from above, but these leave enough space to direct the exhaust gases away from the vehicle. The external fuel tanks (12) positioned on the engine’s sides also add protection. Unlike the jettisonable barrels used on the previous Russian tanks, these external tanks are fixed, and, therefore, are likely to be consumed first to reduce vulnerability in combat.
A front view of the T-15 showing the outer skirts protecting the engine exhaust and intakes.
A rear view of the T-15 showing part of the bar armor protecting the rear ramp door. Photo: Bastion Karpenko
The commander and weapon operator both have vision blocks surrounding their cupola, providing relatively good peripheral vision under armor. The T-15 driver has three vision blocks integrated in the cupola. For complete coverage, panoramic cameras are positioned around the vehicle. One pair of these cameras can be seen left of the flat sensor under the Kornet missile launcher tubes. The sensor is coupled with the ‘Soft Kill’ pedestal seen at the center, just behind the Afghanit APS Hard Kill tubes. system Photo: Bastion Karpenko
The T-14 tank mounts two active protection assemblies on both sides of the turret. Covered by passive armor for ballistic protection, these modules integrate the Afghanit sensor (trapezoidal unit), five hard-kill launch tubes mounted at the turret’s base, two peripheral cameras and flat (possibly covered) sensor, likely radar coupled with the soft-kill system. Some sources indicate these sensors are derived from AESA radar technology developed and implemented on the Sukhoi T-50 stealth fighter jet. The rotatable soft-kill launcher containing 12 cartridges can be seen above, mounted on a rotating pedestal.
A front view of the T-14. Note the driver has no vision blocks or other notable viewing devices on his position, although, when buttoned up, the driver may be using the vision system seen at the center of the tank. but a full set of fixed periscopes is placed behind his position. The two headlights use lensed LEDs providing different intensity of visible or infrared lighting on demand. Photo: Andrey Kryuchenko
A forward left side view of the T-14 tank based on Armata platform preparing for the May 9th parade in Moscow.
- إنضم
- 28 مارس 2011
- المشاركات
- 1,155
- التفاعل
نظام الحماية الافغاني الموضوع على هذه الدبابة يستطيع اكتشاف اهداف على بعد 50متر واعتراضها في حدود 25 متر كما هو موضح في الصورة ادناه
كما يستطيع اعتراض اهداف تبلغ سرعتها 1700م/ثانية
كما يستطيع اعتراض اهداف تبلغ سرعتها 1700م/ثانية
المواضيع المشابهة
