تطورات الساحة الفلسطينية ( متابعة مستمره ) #منتدى_الدفاع_العربي
- بادئ الموضوع الأميرال
- تاريخ البدء
- الحالة
- إنضم
- 12 أكتوبر 2013
- المشاركات
- 131
- التفاعل
- إنضم
- 24 ديسمبر 2009
- المشاركات
- 23,722
- التفاعل
11:55 كتائب القسام تقصف قاعدة "رعيم" العسكرية بصاروخي غراد
11:30 كتائب القسام تقصف "مفلاسيم" بـ(5) صواريخ قسام
11:40 كتائب القسام تقصف أسدود المحتلة بصاروخي غراد
11:40 كتائب القسام تقصف مغتصبة كفار عزة ب3 قذائف هاون 120
11:00 كتائب القسام تعاود قصف بئيري في أشكول بصاروخي 107 وتؤكد إصابة مبنى بشكل مباشر
10:30 كتائب القسام تقصف مغتصبة كفار عزة ب5 صواريخ 107
08:30 كتائب القسام تقصف بئيري بصاروخي 107
11:30 كتائب القسام تقصف "مفلاسيم" بـ(5) صواريخ قسام
11:40 كتائب القسام تقصف أسدود المحتلة بصاروخي غراد
11:40 كتائب القسام تقصف مغتصبة كفار عزة ب3 قذائف هاون 120
11:00 كتائب القسام تعاود قصف بئيري في أشكول بصاروخي 107 وتؤكد إصابة مبنى بشكل مباشر
10:30 كتائب القسام تقصف مغتصبة كفار عزة ب5 صواريخ 107
08:30 كتائب القسام تقصف بئيري بصاروخي 107
- إنضم
- 25 مايو 2008
- المشاركات
- 24,408
- التفاعل
- الدولة
هذه المشاركة تم التبليغ عنها لكن فعلا يوجد في فورين بوليسي مصدر لها فعلا وهو ذات الكلام حول أن الطرف الذي كسب معركة غزة هو الذي لم يحارب وايضا عن ان مصر ورطت اسرائيل في صراع مع غزة و.............. الخ
بغض النظر عن مضمون الكلام ومغزاه ولماذا يقال وكيف يتم تفسيره
الخبر هذا متعلق بالموضوع وله مصدر وبالتالي لا اجد مبررا لحذفه واطلب من صاحبه اعادة تنسيقه لأن الكلام غير مفهوم في النصف الثاني من المقاله بسبب خطأ كتابي
التعديل الأخير:
- إنضم
- 10 أغسطس 2014
- المشاركات
- 784
- التفاعل
اسأل المصدر؟ كأني كاتب المقال
المجلة الامريكية لا تترك لك القراءة بدون تسجيل ودفع$
- إنضم
- 25 مايو 2008
- المشاركات
- 24,408
- التفاعل
- الدولة
بحثت ووجدته ووفرت عليك عناء ذلك لأن ردك كان محل شكوى وتحققت منها وانتهى الأمر ... ثم ثانيا هدئ اسلوبك يا أخي لست عدوك انا
عموما اتمنى تعديل المقال الذي وضعته لأن كتابته بالأسفل غير واضحة
بالمناسبة رابط فورين بوليسي مفتوح
رابط الخبر
- إنضم
- 10 أغسطس 2014
- المشاركات
- 784
- التفاعل
انا قمت ببحث في المجلة او ي موضوع افتحه يطلب مني التسجيل واستفادي من تخفيض، انا هادئ والحمد لله ، ولست لا بعدوك ولا بأخوك.
الموضوع لا يفتح لي ، ما رأيك؟
- إنضم
- 2 أكتوبر 2010
- المشاركات
- 11,162
- التفاعل
- الدولة
المتحدث بأسم جيش الاحتلال الاسرائيلي يقول : تم اطلاق صاروخ من غزة قبل لحظات
IDF @IDFSpokesperson 43 د
Moments ago, a rocket fired from Gaza was intercepted above Gan Yavne.
IDF @IDFSpokesperson 43 د
Moments ago, a rocket fired from Gaza was intercepted above Gan Yavne.
- إنضم
- 25 مايو 2008
- المشاركات
- 24,408
- التفاعل
- الدولة
a
الموضوع اهوه ........... سهله
as negotiations on a lasting cease-fire in Gaza grind on in Cairo, it's not only the animosity between Israel and Hamas that is complicating the talks -- it's also Egypt's role as mediator. Egypt's internal politics -- far more fraught and violent than they were during Hosni Mubarak's era -- have intruded on the attempts to reach an agreement, as the military-dominated government in Cairo attempts to use the talks as part of its war against the Muslim Brotherhood.
This subtle shift -- from mediator with interests, to interested party that also mediates -- has led to a longer and bloodier Gaza war than might otherwise have been the case. And while a strong Egypt-Israel alliance was supposed to cut Hamas down to size, this strategy has also backfired on the diplomatic front. However much it has bloodied Hamas -- and particularly the population of Gaza -- the war has actually led to a breaking of international taboos on dealing with Hamas, a former pariah.
Egypt has always brought its own long-standing national security interests to the table in previous Gaza mediation efforts. Cairo has never wanted militants or weapons to enter Egypt from Gaza, nor has it wanted to take over responsibility for humanitarian or security affairs there, having had the unhappy experience of occupying the Gaza Strip for almost 20 years following 1948. Egyptian intelligence officials have always taken the lead in dealing with Gaza -- even during the yearlong presidency of the Muslim Brotherhood's Mohamed Morsi. While one might have thought that Morsi would have opened the floodgates to Hamas, the Brotherhood's ideological bedfellow, in actuality Egypt kept the border with Gaza largely closed during his presidency and continued efforts to destroy tunnels. Whatever his personal sympathies, Morsi stayed within the lines of a policy designed to ensure that Egypt was not stuck holding the Gaza hot potato.
But after removing Morsi in a July 2013 coup, Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, then defense minister and now president, transformed Egypt's policy toward Gaza into part of his larger domestic and international political agenda. He is clearly using Gaza to prosecute his own relentless crackdown against the Brotherhood -- an effort that also helps cement his alignment with Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.
In the first phase of Egyptian diplomacy during this recent Gaza war, Egyptian mediators played their hand transparently -- and ruthlessly. They attempted to corner Hamas by publicly announcing a cease-fire proposal on July 15 that had only been coordinated with Israel; when Hamas balked, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu promptly announced that the rejection provided "international legitimacy" for an expanded Israeli operation. Thus what was touted as a proposal to end the conflict actually enabled a ground incursion, which resulted in a more thorough elimination of Hamas tunnels and rockets than Israeli missiles alone would have been able to accomplish.
The ground invasion also led to at least 1,600 more Palestinian deaths. Previous Egyptian presidents would have blanched at complicity in such violence.
As the conflict continued, however, Sisi found that he could no longer completely exclude Hamas if he also wanted to preserve Egypt's role as mediator between Israel and the Palestinians. And indeed, for all the ways in which the diplomatic efforts to manage the Gaza war have worked against Hamas, one of the most striking aspects of the current Egyptian-led effort has been how it has shattered the fiction that Israel and Hamas will not negotiate.
The two parties have conducted diplomacy before, of course -- but it was also carried out with levels of deniability, indirectness, and distaste. Each round of fighting chipped away at the principle that Israel and Hamas do not deal with each other diplomatically. Now the only dimension missing is direct contact: Diplomacy takes place in Cairo, with delegations arriving in daylight and exchanging positions (and threats) not merely in public, but through Egyptian mediators.
This process has also shattered another myth -- that the primary game in town is about how to achieve a two-state solution between Israel and the PLO.
This process has also shattered another myth -- that the primary game in town is about how to achieve a two-state solution between Israel and the PLO. Today, two-state diplomacy seems to be at best in hibernation. The talks in Cairo, on the other hand, are substantial. They cover violence, security, reconstruction, living conditions in Gaza, movement and access to the territory, Hamas-Fatah reconciliation, and internal Palestinian governance.
In that sense, Cairo is presiding over a process that follows the priorities of Hamas, which has always rejected the diplomatic process that began with the 1993 Oslo Accords. The current state of negotiations reflects Hamas's position that only talks about interim arrangements and truces are acceptable; conflict-ending diplomacy is not. The Israeli right can also feel vindicated, as the talks suggest that the conflict might be managed, but that it will not be resolved anytime soon.
The Palestinian Islamist camp and the Israeli right, however, should take little joy in this accomplishment. The diplomatic efforts led by Egypt will likely give Hamas little, and the new Egypt-Israel alliance is based on a short-term coincidence of interests rather than any strategic consideration. Israeli and Palestinian societies, meanwhile, are already paying a high price for the continuing failure to reach a lasting peace accord.
There is one more troubling aspect of Cairo's diplomacy that has largely escaped notice. While Egyptian mediators were forced in the end to deal directly with Hamas's leadership in order to reach a cease-fire, they have tried to mitigate this unpleasant reality in two ways. They have not only been seeking to enhance the role of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas -- something Mubarak always did in his day -- but may also be flirting with Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ), a group far more committed to violence against Israel than Hamas. PIJ leaders such as Khaled al-Batsh have been quoted in the Egyptian government-owned media recently insisting that no other state can take Egypt's place as mediator.
Egypt's military-dominated regime, then, has proved that it is not against forging alliances with violent Islamists; its only feud is with those allied with the Muslim Brotherhood. The apparent Egypt-PIJ flirtation highlights how the country's highly polarized politics might cause Cairo's military-dominated leadership to cultivate clients that are hardly in the interests of the United States or Israel. An Egypt that looks and acts more and more like Pakistan is not something to celebrate.
الرابط عندك
الموضوع اهوه ........... سهله
as negotiations on a lasting cease-fire in Gaza grind on in Cairo, it's not only the animosity between Israel and Hamas that is complicating the talks -- it's also Egypt's role as mediator. Egypt's internal politics -- far more fraught and violent than they were during Hosni Mubarak's era -- have intruded on the attempts to reach an agreement, as the military-dominated government in Cairo attempts to use the talks as part of its war against the Muslim Brotherhood.
This subtle shift -- from mediator with interests, to interested party that also mediates -- has led to a longer and bloodier Gaza war than might otherwise have been the case. And while a strong Egypt-Israel alliance was supposed to cut Hamas down to size, this strategy has also backfired on the diplomatic front. However much it has bloodied Hamas -- and particularly the population of Gaza -- the war has actually led to a breaking of international taboos on dealing with Hamas, a former pariah.
Egypt has always brought its own long-standing national security interests to the table in previous Gaza mediation efforts. Cairo has never wanted militants or weapons to enter Egypt from Gaza, nor has it wanted to take over responsibility for humanitarian or security affairs there, having had the unhappy experience of occupying the Gaza Strip for almost 20 years following 1948. Egyptian intelligence officials have always taken the lead in dealing with Gaza -- even during the yearlong presidency of the Muslim Brotherhood's Mohamed Morsi. While one might have thought that Morsi would have opened the floodgates to Hamas, the Brotherhood's ideological bedfellow, in actuality Egypt kept the border with Gaza largely closed during his presidency and continued efforts to destroy tunnels. Whatever his personal sympathies, Morsi stayed within the lines of a policy designed to ensure that Egypt was not stuck holding the Gaza hot potato.
But after removing Morsi in a July 2013 coup, Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, then defense minister and now president, transformed Egypt's policy toward Gaza into part of his larger domestic and international political agenda. He is clearly using Gaza to prosecute his own relentless crackdown against the Brotherhood -- an effort that also helps cement his alignment with Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.
In the first phase of Egyptian diplomacy during this recent Gaza war, Egyptian mediators played their hand transparently -- and ruthlessly. They attempted to corner Hamas by publicly announcing a cease-fire proposal on July 15 that had only been coordinated with Israel; when Hamas balked, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu promptly announced that the rejection provided "international legitimacy" for an expanded Israeli operation. Thus what was touted as a proposal to end the conflict actually enabled a ground incursion, which resulted in a more thorough elimination of Hamas tunnels and rockets than Israeli missiles alone would have been able to accomplish.
The ground invasion also led to at least 1,600 more Palestinian deaths. Previous Egyptian presidents would have blanched at complicity in such violence.
As the conflict continued, however, Sisi found that he could no longer completely exclude Hamas if he also wanted to preserve Egypt's role as mediator between Israel and the Palestinians. And indeed, for all the ways in which the diplomatic efforts to manage the Gaza war have worked against Hamas, one of the most striking aspects of the current Egyptian-led effort has been how it has shattered the fiction that Israel and Hamas will not negotiate.
The two parties have conducted diplomacy before, of course -- but it was also carried out with levels of deniability, indirectness, and distaste. Each round of fighting chipped away at the principle that Israel and Hamas do not deal with each other diplomatically. Now the only dimension missing is direct contact: Diplomacy takes place in Cairo, with delegations arriving in daylight and exchanging positions (and threats) not merely in public, but through Egyptian mediators.
This process has also shattered another myth -- that the primary game in town is about how to achieve a two-state solution between Israel and the PLO.
This process has also shattered another myth -- that the primary game in town is about how to achieve a two-state solution between Israel and the PLO. Today, two-state diplomacy seems to be at best in hibernation. The talks in Cairo, on the other hand, are substantial. They cover violence, security, reconstruction, living conditions in Gaza, movement and access to the territory, Hamas-Fatah reconciliation, and internal Palestinian governance.
In that sense, Cairo is presiding over a process that follows the priorities of Hamas, which has always rejected the diplomatic process that began with the 1993 Oslo Accords. The current state of negotiations reflects Hamas's position that only talks about interim arrangements and truces are acceptable; conflict-ending diplomacy is not. The Israeli right can also feel vindicated, as the talks suggest that the conflict might be managed, but that it will not be resolved anytime soon.
The Palestinian Islamist camp and the Israeli right, however, should take little joy in this accomplishment. The diplomatic efforts led by Egypt will likely give Hamas little, and the new Egypt-Israel alliance is based on a short-term coincidence of interests rather than any strategic consideration. Israeli and Palestinian societies, meanwhile, are already paying a high price for the continuing failure to reach a lasting peace accord.
There is one more troubling aspect of Cairo's diplomacy that has largely escaped notice. While Egyptian mediators were forced in the end to deal directly with Hamas's leadership in order to reach a cease-fire, they have tried to mitigate this unpleasant reality in two ways. They have not only been seeking to enhance the role of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas -- something Mubarak always did in his day -- but may also be flirting with Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ), a group far more committed to violence against Israel than Hamas. PIJ leaders such as Khaled al-Batsh have been quoted in the Egyptian government-owned media recently insisting that no other state can take Egypt's place as mediator.
Egypt's military-dominated regime, then, has proved that it is not against forging alliances with violent Islamists; its only feud is with those allied with the Muslim Brotherhood. The apparent Egypt-PIJ flirtation highlights how the country's highly polarized politics might cause Cairo's military-dominated leadership to cultivate clients that are hardly in the interests of the United States or Israel. An Egypt that looks and acts more and more like Pakistan is not something to celebrate.
- إنضم
- 10 أغسطس 2014
- المشاركات
- 784
- التفاعل
http://carnegieendowment.org/2014/08/18/how-egypt-prolonged-gaza-war/hlfs
وجدت الخبر في جهة اخرى ، وضعت الخبر في المترجم لاقرأه ، اتمنى ان يكون الموضوع المترجم مفهوم جيدا وواضح
- إنضم
- 25 مايو 2008
- المشاركات
- 24,408
- التفاعل
- الدولة
شكرا
- إنضم
- 10 أغسطس 2014
- المشاركات
- 784
- التفاعل
لا شكرا لا عليك
المهم ان المقال الاصلي لا يختلف عن المنقول
- إنضم
- 25 مايو 2008
- المشاركات
- 24,408
- التفاعل
- الدولة
كما اخبرتك شكوى وتم تفنيدها والمقال المنقول لا يختلف عن الأصل في فورين بوليسي
- إنضم
- 12 مارس 2014
- المشاركات
- 461
- التفاعل
نتنياهو: العدوان سيتواصل ولا حصانة لأي شخص … يعالون: نحارب "عدو" لا يرحم ولا يوجد حلول سحرية
تاريخ النشر : 2014-08-24
القدس - ترجمة ومتابعة دنيا الوطن.
افتتح رئيس الوزراء الإسرائيلي بنيامين نتنياهو اليوم جلسة الحكومة بالتأكيد على أنه لن يوقف العملية العسكرية بقطاع غزة حتى استعادة الهدوء جنوب دولة الكيان زاعما أن حماس تدفع ثمنا باهضا محذرا سكان قطاع غزة المدنيين بضرورة مغادرة أي مكان تجري تتواجد فيه المقاومة الفلسطينية".
وقال نتنياهو سنستهدف أي مكان ولا يوجد حصانة لأي شخص يطلق الصواريخ على إسرائيل " وأضاف " سوف تستمر العملية بغزة حتى تحقق أهدافها وقد قلنا في بدايتها أنها ستستغرق وقتا طويلا ونحن على استعداد لاحتمال أن الحملة ستستمر حتى إلى ما بعد بداية العام الدراسي".
ووعد نتنياهو سكان غلاف غزة من المستوطنين بحزمة استثنائية من المساعدات معبرا عن اعجابه بثباتهم وصمودهم ؟!!
ويشار إلى أن مستوطني غلاف غزة أخلوا جميع مساكنهم بعد دعوة وزير الأمن الداخلي لهم بتركها والتوجه إلى المناطق الشمالية بسبب تواصل سقوط الصواريخ.
وزعم نتنياهو أن العديد من الدول في المنطقة والغرب يفهمون موقفنا ويقفون جبهة واحدة لأن حماس هي "داعش" وانها تتصرف بنفس الطريقة مدللا باعتراف قيادة حماس بقتل المستوطنين الثلاثة في مدينة الخليل.
قال وزير الجيش الإسرائيلي موشيه يعالون اليوم أن العملية العسكرية في قطاع غزة ستنتهي فقط عندما يتم استعادة الهدوء في الجنوب وتتوقف الهجمات الصاروخية. موضحا أنه حتى ذلك الحين ستواصل إسرائيل قصف غزة " ففي الوقت الراهن من الجو " ولكن لدينا طرق أخرى أيضا" وفق قول يعالون.
وأضاف يعالون أن إسرائيل في خضم عملية معقدة طويلة ضد "عدو" لا يرحم زاعما أن الأضرار التي لحقت بحركة حماس غير مسبوقة داعيا المواطنين في إسرائيل للصبر لأنه لا توجد حلول سحرية.
وكال يعالون المديح لسكان المنطقة الجنوبية في إسرائيل واصفا اياهم بخيرة سكان إسرائيل. مشيرا إلى أنه التقى اليوم مع رؤساء المجلس المحلي في الجنوب واصفا مشاعرهم بالصعبة والمبررة مؤكدا أن جيشه سيساعدهم وملتزم باعادة الهدوء والأمن لحياتهم.
وأوضح يعالون قائلا خلال تقديمه التعازي لعائلة إسرائيلي قتل بصواريخ فلسطينية :" إذا اعتقد قادة حماس أنهم قادرون على استنزافنا فإنهم مخطئون لأن لدينا الصبر" وفق مزاعمه.
وتأتي تصريحات يعالون مع استمرار نجاح المقاومة الفلسطينية بإطلاق زخات متتالية من الصواريخ على إسرائيل سقطت آخرها في منطقة مفتوحة بمدينة تل أبيب.
- إنضم
- 10 أغسطس 2014
- المشاركات
- 784
- التفاعل
لم اقرأ الرد بخصوص الشكوى الا بعد لحظات من الان ، لكن قرأت الرد بخصوص المصدر، الناس تشكو تريد مقالات على مقاسها وعلى تفكيرها في مواضيعهم الداخلية يتهمون من يشاء بالارهاب ويسبون الناس والصحافيين العرب ، خليهم الان يضغطو على قلوبهم ويسبو الامريكان ، من اسباب التشاحن العربي عدم تقبل العربي لرأي اخيه المخالف له ، لكن عندما يأتي من الخارج لا بأس.
- إنضم
- 23 أغسطس 2011
- المشاركات
- 16,412
- التفاعل
- الدولة
وكالة CNN : تم اقفال الحظر الجوي على مطار بنغوريون,
ممتاز جدا حظر يقابله حظر, ملايير الدولارات ستبدء بالضياع من اسرائيل,اضافة لشبه تحرير كامل لمحيط غزة = 0 مستوطنين بعد نزوحهم الى النقب و الشمال.
ممتاز جدا حظر يقابله حظر, ملايير الدولارات ستبدء بالضياع من اسرائيل,اضافة لشبه تحرير كامل لمحيط غزة = 0 مستوطنين بعد نزوحهم الى النقب و الشمال.
- إنضم
- 10 أغسطس 2014
- المشاركات
- 784
- التفاعل
تلك الملايير ستعوض وهناك من سيدفع لهم ، الصهاينة منتشرين في كل العالم وسيتلقون دعم من كل الجهات حكومات وشركات .
- إنضم
- 23 أغسطس 2011
- المشاركات
- 16,412
- التفاعل
- الدولة
صحيح الصهاينة منتشرين في كل العالم.
- الحالة
المواضيع المشابهة
- مغلق
