فعلا نقاط التعليق فى الميج 29 ام 2 هى ستة تحت الاجنحة وواحدة ببطن الطائرة
اما الميج 35 هى 8 فى اجنحى الطائرة وواحد ببطنها
يا مسهل عايزين اختلافات ثانية عشان نعرف اية اللى جاى
هيكون مكتوب عليها ميج ٣٥ من الشركة المصنعة.
عشان الشعب يفرح
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
ملاحظة: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
فعلا نقاط التعليق فى الميج 29 ام 2 هى ستة تحت الاجنحة وواحدة ببطن الطائرة
اما الميج 35 هى 8 فى اجنحى الطائرة وواحد ببطنها
يا مسهل عايزين اختلافات ثانية عشان نعرف اية اللى جاى
ولما لا تكون تعويض لما فاتها واستعادة لسطوتها وعودة لقوة و وضع يجب ان تكون فيهكانها مقبلة على حدث جلل
وهوا انتا فاكر انها لما تييجى ان شاء الله هتشوفها بكامل تسليحها او هتعرف مواصفاتها حتىاما الميج 35 هى 8 فى اجنحى الطائرة وواحد ببطنها
ولما لا تكون تعويض لما فاتها واستعادة لسطوتها وعودة لقوة و وضع يجب ان تكون فيه
رمانة الميزان
متأخرة كثيراً جدااااااامتاخرة كتير ؟ الاجابة لا
هيكون مكتوب عليها ميج ٣٥ من الشركة المصنعة.
عشان الشعب يفرح
مصر تسابق الزمن لاعادة تسليح كافة افرع الجيش المصر بالاخص جويا وبحرا
كانها مقبلة على حدث جلل
ده يا باشا مع دولة طبيعيةايوه هيا متاخرة عسكريا لو تقصد لما كان لنا من قبل
من السبق فى الصناعة والتسليح وكذا
اذا قارنت الحالة الحالية للبلد والتاخر الرهيب فى جميع المجالات
والحالة الاقتصادية وخلافه هتلاقى ان تاخر التسليح مش كبير للدرجة اللى متاخراها البلد ككل فى جميع المجالات الاخرى
فهمت وجهة نظرى
موضوع جميل عن الميج٣٥
MiG-35, brief review
Looking on the long discussions on Bharat-Rakshak Indian military forum I felt the need to make some short review about MiG-35. As usually I use only open source information in my post. It is from different on-line or off-line sources, Russian and foreign.
Sometimes the contradicting sentences are seen about this plane:
1) The aircraft has an old-fashion plane, way older, than any other MMRCA tender contenders except F-16. So it's at the end of its life, cannot be kept modernized in next 20-30 years.
2) The aircraft is a 'paper plane'. So, its capability is totally uncertain and a purchasing would be accompanied with high risk.
MiG-35 has improved aerodynamic with sharp LERX, wider nose con for more powerful radar option, bigger cage with better ergonomics, absence of upper air-intakes for garbage defense on taking-of, with special unclose grids instead.
New 3-chennal fly-by-wire KSU-961 system with 4-time signal doubling. It's made on the basis of MiG-29K/KUB's FBW KSU-941 system and provides controllability of flying in all modes including super- maneuvering on over-critical AoA too. It provides automatic refueling in the fly as well.
The new big-blocks technology of welding is using on MiG-35. The use of composites is higher than with MiG-29K/KUB.The airframe life resource is 6,000 h or 40 years comparing to 2,500 h or 20 years on serial soviet MiG-29 and MiG-29SMT.
Improved aerodynamic and mechanization of the wings, higher wing area. Generally it's similar to MiG-29K wing but without folding. 11 load points allow 6,500 kg of load. No dorsal air-brake (as a variant).
The chassis is longer, and then the plane is sitting in more straight position than classic MiG-29.
The internal fuel capacity is raised as 1.5 times on MiG-35 and achieves 4,800 kg. New load points allow up to 5 external fuel tanks. The capacity of the central one was raised from 1520 to 2150 liters. However, the two-sitting MiG-35D variant lacks one internal fuel tank with 630 liter of capacity.
Under-pylon refueling PAZ-MK kit turns the plane into reciprocal refueler.
Engines
MiG-35/35D has two RD-33MK Klimov's engines with maximal thrust on afterburner 9,000 kgf, on maximal dry – 5,400 kgf. The life resource of this engine (4,000 h) was raised significantly comparing to standard RD-33 ser. 3 (2,500 h) which is used on Russian and Indian MiG-29's and which technology is already transferring to India. The time before overall is 1000 h. If a customer wants, MiG-35 may be equipped with Klimov's RD-33MKV engine with all-aspect thrust vectoring nozzles. It was over all testing on the board of MiG-29M-OVT №156.
RD-33MK has FADEC 'BARK-42' and both are produced in serial for MiG-29K/KUB Indian Navy fighters. Modifications with higher thrust and resource are under development in 'Klimov Gas-Turbine Design' house.
The new gear system KSA-33M and turbo-starter VK-100 are developed for this plane by 'Klimov'.
Radar and avionics
Open architecture MiL-STD-1553B bus is used. HOTAS control. Zhuk-AE AESA radar (wasdescribed before ).
MiG-35 has 5th generation OLS-UEM FLIR – for frontal hemisphere searching and OLS-K (in conformal container under the right inlet) – for searching in bottom hemisphere. The manufacturer: NIIPP (Moscow).
OLS-UEM specs:
IR, TV and laser range finder
Angle of searching
Horizontal -- +-90 grad
Vertical -- +60 - -15 grad.
Head-on target detection – 15 km
Detection on chase - 45 km
Laser range finder - 15 kmOLS-K specs:
IR, TV, laser range-finder and laser spot finder.
Max. range of detection
Tank - 20 km
Fast boat - 40 km
Laser range finder, max distance - 20 km
Spotting targets - yes
Mass 110 kg
As a more cheap option, the 4th generation UOMZ's KOLS-13SM FLIR together with Sapsan-E laser pod are offered.
Missile Aproach Warning (MAW) system includes two modules for bottom and upper hemispheres. Developer: NIIPP.
Specs:
Mass - 9.5 kg
Range of detection, max :
air-to-air missiles - 30 km
ground based AAMs --50 km
shoulder AAMs -10 km
Radar warning system L-150 (TsKB 'Avtomatika', Omsk) has 4 stations on the wing flaps and vertical fins margins.
The enemy laser detection kit can detect an enemy laser on up to 30 km distance. The laser wave is - 1.06 – 1.57 micrometers. Developer: NIIPP. Its mass is 800 g, including two sensors on wing flaps.
Active EW kit: SAP-518 or KS-418. Developer: KNIRTI (Kaluga). It has high frequency emitters inside the wings and tail and medium frequency emitter under the left wing. As an option, the Italian 'Elettronnica S.p.A ELT/568(V)2 EW system is offered for Indian MMRCA tender. Other foreign or Indian EW systems could be adopted on MiG-35 too.
Passive decoys system.
'Black box' registration system 'Karat-B-35' is offered for foreign customers of MiG-35.
SVR-23M1K video registration system is installed.
The weapon outcome control system 'Trenage-29' is offered with MiG-35 too.
Thales' 'Topsight' HMDS is offered in a first line. It's similar to that on serial Indian MiG-29K's. The Russian 5th generation HMDS is under development by NPO 'Geofizika'.
The display configuration does repeat MiG-29K/KUB. MiG-29K cage has 3 6x8 inches displays, wide angle on glass indication panel. The second pilot cage on MiG-35D has 4 displays. The resolution and display refresh rate are higher than MFI-10-7 1024x768 pixels displays on MiG-29K/KUB board.
The navigation system is PrNK-35 of RPKB with inertial and satellite GPS-GLONASS navigation subsystems.
A number of Indian systems could be installed as well, according to what Indian customer wishes (if yes).
Weapon
- RVVE-AE medial range active homing AAMs.
- R-73E close combat AAMs
- 80mm and 122 mm unguided rockets kits
- Kh-29TE and other types of Kh-29 AGMs family
- KAB-500 and KAB-1500 family guided bombs.
- other 100 – 500 kg bombs of different types
- long range air-to-surface missiles of 'Club' family (3M-14AE, 3M-54AE1, 3M-54AE)
- Supersonic anti-ship and anti-radiation missiles of Kh-31 family.
- Subsonic net-centric anti-ship Kh-31 'Uran' missiles.
- 30 mm GSh-301 auto cannon.
Life cycle cost
The service of MiG-35 is executed by condition, with condition assessment each 1000 flight hours up to max. 6000 hours of life (or 40 years of service).
For comparison classic MiG-29 has only 2500 hours of life resource (or 20 years). Periodic routine service each 100 fly hours (1 year) is needed. Order works are each 200 f.h. (24 months). Plant MLU is needed on 800 and 1500 f.h. (9 and 17 years of service).
With all the amortization in consideration the flight hour cost of MiG-35 is as 2.5 times cheaper than for classic MiG-29!
There is an old calculation from the middle of 90th, for classic MiG-29's in Eastern Europe. Then the flight hour cost was $3000 for MiG-29 and $2000 for F-16 - it's without amortization cost.
In 1994 – 1996 a new MiG-29's price was as $25 000 000. F-16's price was $18 600 000. MiG-29's airframe life was – 2,500 hours, or $10 000 for 1 hour. F-16's airframe life was – 8,000 hours, or $2,325 for hour. Mig-29's RD-33 engine of old serials has life of 800 hours, wile F-16's engine of that time has 2000 hours life. So, with all the life cycle expenditure the difference in flight hour cost between two planes was much higher: $15 500 for MiG-29 and about $5 900 for F-16! Even after the dollar/ruble parity has changed the prices very significant, single-engine F-16 remain to be more attractive in terms of lifecycle cost against classic MiG-29. With new MiG-35 coming, this advantage is going to totally diminish.
مفيش ملخص للترجمة ولا علشان انتم دكاترة ومهندسين بتاع الدبلون يعنى ملهوش نفس يعرف فية اية
ولا يهمك يا باشاالف شكر على الترجمة
اخوك بلح فى الانجليزى
شكلي حكره الميج 35
مثل ما كرهت الرافال من مقارنتها بالتايفون
هو سؤال يبدو ساذج ولكنة حب الفضول
حد يعرف يفرق فى الشكل بين الميج 29 والميج 35
يعنى ليس من المعقول لما نستلمها ﻻ نعرف اذا كانت هى ميج 29 ام 35
اكيد فية فروق فى الانف فى الاجنحة الفتحات الهوائية ، المحركات
هو سؤال يبدو ساذج ولكنة حب الفضول
حد يعرف يفرق فى الشكل بين الميج 29 والميج 35
يعنى ليس من المعقول لما نستلمها ﻻ نعرف اذا كانت هى ميج 29 ام 35
اكيد فية فروق فى الانف فى الاجنحة الفتحات الهوائية ، المحركات