- إنضم
- 9 يناير 2008
- المشاركات
- 7,910
- التفاعل
الترتيب في الرابط لاني ما عرفت انزل الصوره لاول 50 دوله عسكريا ارجوا ممن يستطيع انزال الصورتين ان ينزلها
http://www.network54.com/Forum/2118...07/The+WAFF+Military+Strength+Rankings+-+2011
Immediate Military Strength =IMS
Long Term Military Strength =LTMS
NOTES
Each country has two rankings, Immediate Military Strength (IMS) and Long Term Military Strength (LTMS), IMS represents the military strength of a country in a time frame of 1 - 6 months. LTMS represents the military strength of a nation in the 1 year or more, and also looks at a nation's ability to sustain itself in a long term conflict.
The IMS and LTMS values are factored to be on the same scale (well close anyway), so that one can look at the relative values of a country on each scale and get an idea as to it's increase in military strength over time. Or make the comparison to say that over the course of a full year of mobilization Country A becomes about as powerful as Country B is today. However, this equivalency breaks down towards the ends of the scale, so the comparisons for a very, very powerful nations (i.e. the USA) and very, very weak nations (i.e. Belize) will not be very accurate.
Nuclear Weapons (and other WMDs) are not accounted for, use of these weapons has a political and diplomatic dimension which is virtually impossible to factor in any kind of mathematical sense. That being said we have noted each nation that has nuclear weapons by noting them in bold on the list.
The relative strength value is calculated on IMS ONLY and represents how strong a nation is relative to the one of above it in the rankings (so, for example, Russia is about as powerful, 98.8%, as France today).
FACTORS - IMS
Below is a list of things that are factored in to the Immediate Military Strength Rankings. Note the equation that is applied equally to all countries will not be published. Anyway, in no particular order here are the factors considered...
Number of Troops - this takes into account active, reserve and paramilitary forces. However due to the logistics and resources involved reserves and paramilitaries are not counted fully. The number of these that could be actively engaged within 3 - 6 months is based upon the number of active full-time troops and GDP (PPP)/per capita of the nation in question.
Education Index - Generally speaking, countries with terrible education systems don't field the most sophisticated and well read commanders and officers, nor usually are their troops taught to improvise and think for themselves, hence it's inclusion.
Defence Spending - ...Duh! Seriously though, this data is from SIPRI and is the average spending in the past decade, an amount is calculated on a per soldier basis that also factors in the differences between GDP nominal and GDP PPP and a domestic spending variable.
FACTORS - LTMS
Below is a list of things that are factored into the Long Term Military Strength Rankings. Note the equation that is applied equally to all countries will not be published. Anyway, in no particular order here are the factors considered...
Population - As time wears on in a conflict, the number of troops a nation fields and it's economic ability to sustain a war effort becomes more dependant upon it's population than anything else, this factored in.
Land Area - Obviously territory provides the state the resources it requires to wage a war. In addition having a large area provides a nation with strategic depth, so area is factored into the LTMS ranking. As is population density.
Educational Index - How educated a population is will weigh heavily upon their ability to adapt to new roles in their society, in addition to its implications for the military. So it is factored again against the overall population.
Gross Domestic Product - Both nominal and PPP are considered, and military spending becomes a factor of this based upon the GDP/capita.
http://www.network54.com/Forum/2118...07/The+WAFF+Military+Strength+Rankings+-+2011
Immediate Military Strength =IMS
Long Term Military Strength =LTMS
NOTES
Each country has two rankings, Immediate Military Strength (IMS) and Long Term Military Strength (LTMS), IMS represents the military strength of a country in a time frame of 1 - 6 months. LTMS represents the military strength of a nation in the 1 year or more, and also looks at a nation's ability to sustain itself in a long term conflict.
The IMS and LTMS values are factored to be on the same scale (well close anyway), so that one can look at the relative values of a country on each scale and get an idea as to it's increase in military strength over time. Or make the comparison to say that over the course of a full year of mobilization Country A becomes about as powerful as Country B is today. However, this equivalency breaks down towards the ends of the scale, so the comparisons for a very, very powerful nations (i.e. the USA) and very, very weak nations (i.e. Belize) will not be very accurate.
Nuclear Weapons (and other WMDs) are not accounted for, use of these weapons has a political and diplomatic dimension which is virtually impossible to factor in any kind of mathematical sense. That being said we have noted each nation that has nuclear weapons by noting them in bold on the list.
The relative strength value is calculated on IMS ONLY and represents how strong a nation is relative to the one of above it in the rankings (so, for example, Russia is about as powerful, 98.8%, as France today).
FACTORS - IMS
Below is a list of things that are factored in to the Immediate Military Strength Rankings. Note the equation that is applied equally to all countries will not be published. Anyway, in no particular order here are the factors considered...
Number of Troops - this takes into account active, reserve and paramilitary forces. However due to the logistics and resources involved reserves and paramilitaries are not counted fully. The number of these that could be actively engaged within 3 - 6 months is based upon the number of active full-time troops and GDP (PPP)/per capita of the nation in question.
Education Index - Generally speaking, countries with terrible education systems don't field the most sophisticated and well read commanders and officers, nor usually are their troops taught to improvise and think for themselves, hence it's inclusion.
Defence Spending - ...Duh! Seriously though, this data is from SIPRI and is the average spending in the past decade, an amount is calculated on a per soldier basis that also factors in the differences between GDP nominal and GDP PPP and a domestic spending variable.
FACTORS - LTMS
Below is a list of things that are factored into the Long Term Military Strength Rankings. Note the equation that is applied equally to all countries will not be published. Anyway, in no particular order here are the factors considered...
Population - As time wears on in a conflict, the number of troops a nation fields and it's economic ability to sustain a war effort becomes more dependant upon it's population than anything else, this factored in.
Land Area - Obviously territory provides the state the resources it requires to wage a war. In addition having a large area provides a nation with strategic depth, so area is factored into the LTMS ranking. As is population density.
Educational Index - How educated a population is will weigh heavily upon their ability to adapt to new roles in their society, in addition to its implications for the military. So it is factored again against the overall population.
Gross Domestic Product - Both nominal and PPP are considered, and military spending becomes a factor of this based upon the GDP/capita.
.GIF "Syrian Arab Republic (Syria)"){kind=small}
