حصري :حقيقة الرفال بعيون روسية

مارشال قال:

بتاريخ مايو 2010

First test flight of Rafale fighter powered by upgraded M88-4E engine

رابط

أنقر للتوسيع...

قائد السرب 17 قال:

مين جاب سيرة التسليم الجدول يقتضي ان يبدأ الانتاج في اواخر 2011 والان نحن في 3/2012 ولم نر شيئا

أنقر للتوسيع...

السكون قال:

اخي العزيز لم يكن فيه ابراز نقاط قوة او غيره الموضع

يذكر الخبير الروسي عيوب في الرافال فهل هي

موجوده ام لا

عموما انا لا اثق بالرافال و لا تايفون

كما قلت في مشاركتي الاولى في الموضوع


u s a هم الافضل ملوك الجو بلا منازع

تحياتي لك

أنقر للتوسيع...

قائد السرب 17 قال:

ياخي مالي ومال الاختبارات هناك طائرة اسمها xb70 اختبرت ولكن هل دخلت خط الانتاج


سؤالي هنا لماذا لم يدخل خط الانتاج

أنقر للتوسيع...

بابل قال:

بصراحة فلسفة الروس بدا يعلوا ​

أنقر للتوسيع...

مارشال قال:

اقرأ معي

qualification and delivery of the first production-standard m88-4e is now slated for the end of 2011.

كلمة تقييم qualification

كلمة delivery

مامعنى كلمة delivery ...؟؟

أليس تسليم ...؟

تسليم لمن ....؟؟؟

أليس للزبون ...؟؟

هل تمت تعاقدات زمنية أم مفاوضات مازالت ..؟؟؟

رابط

أنقر للتوسيع...

مارشال قال:

عزيزي ..............

الإماراتيين ارتضوا المحرك الأخير بعيدا عن كلام الخبير الروسي واستطاعت الرافال حمل 3 صواريخ بلاك شاهين بنجاح في صحراء الإمارات طبعا الى الاّن التايفون لا تستطيع حمل السكالب الا للشو الاعلامي فقط .

وبالتالي قصور المحرك هذا كلام اقرب للدوران في حلقة مفرغة

الخبير الروسي ليس افضل من السويسريين وبالتالي اتعجب من انتقائكم لمصادركم

فخبير روسي قال بأن السوخوي 35 تتفوق على طائرات الجيل الرابع بما فيها f-15 والكل تهجم عليه اليوم صار كلام الخبير حكما ومواعظ وبالتالي حينما تريد التحدث عن الرافال تحدث وقل (والله اعلى وأعلم )

اما اضطرار الهند لتمويل التطوير فبالطبع انت لم تفهم شيئ ولا أدري من اين تضع كلمة مستشار عسكري تحت اسمك ...!!

الكلام ليس بفلوس حتى .

قلت مرار وتكرار مشكلة الامارات انها طلبت تطوير للرافال لا تستطيع داسو تلبيته ماديا والامارات لم توافق على التمويل اكثر من ثمن الصفقة نفسهات وبالتالي جاءت اموال الهند لتحافظ على قدرة داسو على التطويرات التي طلبتها الامارات ومنها الرادار والمحرك وكل التطويرات السابقة التي تكتبها والتي ستحصل عليها الهند بموجب تعاقدها مع داسو وتمويلها لداسو

الامارات كانت اكثر تشددا مع داسو من الهند وبالنهاية ستحصل داسو على العقود والهند والامارات على رافال قادرة

أما الحديث عن الرافال ومصر فربما أراك متتبعا المواضيع المصرية بشكل ملحوظ في مخيلتي ينم عن حب عميق لكن لا عليك

الخبير الروسي قال فقط ... وأنا مصدر نفسي ياعزيزي

ربما أنا أكبر مما تتخيل بمراحل .

لذا لا عليك المهم فقط الا تشخصن المواضيع في كل الأوقات

أنقر للتوسيع...

عندما تخرج هكذا جمله من فم " ملوك البهلوانيات في الجو على مستوى العالم " لايمكن أن تمر مثل هكذا عباره ....مرور الكرام ياحج مارش على ما أعتقد ..ولاإيه رأيك ياحج ...!!!

قائد السرب 17 قال:

تسليم للزبون اي زبون لرافال في 2011؟؟؟؟؟
لا يوجد سوى سلاح الجو الفرنسي

ولم يستلم سلاح الجو الفرنسي على حد علمي ولا حبه

أنقر للتوسيع...

red scorpion six قال:

(((التايفون أفضل من الرافال ................بالمناوره)))

عندما تخرج هكذا جمله من فم " ملوك البهلوانيات في الجو على مستوى العالم " لايمكن أن تمر مثل هكذا عباره ....مرور الكرام ياحج مارش على ما أعتقد ..ولاإيه رأيك ياحج ...!!!

أنقر للتوسيع...

Eurofighter Typhoon قال:

أنقر للتوسيع...

mahmoud s قال:

ان محركاتها ليست مضمونه بشكل كامل وتحتاج لتحسين واكمال عمل

عجبتني اوي الحتة دي
بتبين اد ايه مستوي النفاق
وعلي رأي المثل ادي العيش لخبازه
فالفرنسين هم اسياد العالم في تكنولوجيا الطيران بلا منافس خاصا الافونكس ومعدات التشويش الاخري

أنقر للتوسيع...

الملك اطس قال:

مادخل المحرك في ابواد التشويش


اساسا لو كان ينافق كان قال ان t50 تنافس f 22

أنقر للتوسيع...

الملك اطس قال:

مادخل المحرك في ابواد التشويش


اساسا لو كان ينافق كان قال ان t50 تنافس f 22

أنقر للتوسيع...

صرح قائد سلاح الجو الروسي الجنرال الكسندر زيلين، لوكالة أنباء "نوفوستي" بأن دراسة مقارنة أظهرت تفوق مقاتلة الجيل الخامس الروسية "تي-50" على مثيلتها الأميركية "أف – 22" في عدد من المواصفات، كالسرعة والمدى وقوة دفع المحرك.

أنقر للتوسيع...

السطـوهـ السعوديـة قال:

الشيخ محمد بن زايد مستغرب كيف عملت داسو على صفقة الرافال للهند ؟!

Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi and Deputy Supreme Commander of the UAE Armed Forces General Sheikh Mohammad Bin Zayed Al Nahyan is said to be wondering how Dassault worked on the Rafale deal with India.


بل أن الامارات تقول ان صفقة الرافال غير قادرة على المنافسة وغير قابلة للتطبيق


http://uk.reuters.com/article/2011/11/16/uk-uae-warplanes-idUKTRE7AF0YB20111116


كما ان الامارات تريد الحصول على محركات جديدة وقوية وتحسين مدى الرادار

The United Arab Emirates has pressed for the aircraft's engines to be upgraded with extra thrust and for better radar


ومعها حق صراحة فإذا كانت التايفون T2 ( الإصدار الثاني والغير مكتمل )

تساوي الرافال F3 ( الإصدار الثالث والمكتمل ) فلا تلام الأمارات في عدم قبولها بالرافال الحالية

لكن هناك مشكلة تواجه متطلبات الامارات ، فالمحركات الجديدة تحتاج الى تعديل في بدن الرافال

وتحسين مدى الرادار يتعارض مع نظام السبكترا


And about the UAE demand to have a more powerful RBE2 radar, could it answer to some expectations for the Air force?
The Air Force is interested in having a RBE2 with an active antenna. It is now established with the powerful AESA antenna which will equip our tranche 4 Rafale. What the Emirians are calling for is much more complex. They want, in addition to the AESA, to have new functionalities on their Rafale, such as GMTT / GMTI (detection and tracking of moving ground target), interlacing between air/air and air/ground modes, etc.. Even if this is not for us an urgent need, the operational 'plus' obtained could nonetheless eventually interest us. However, the key Emirian demand is about the range of the RBE2. And, with the same antenna diameter, the only way to achieve the 10% range increase (compared with the Basic AESA F3 "roadmap") that wish to obtain the Emirians, is a big boost to the power of the radar.
But more power to the RBE2, could it be a risk to generate serious electromagnetic interference (EMI) with the SPECTRA receptors ?


وللمزيد من الفضائح تفضلوا











With the general Alain SILVY
Deputy Chief Plans within the Staff of the Air Force.

The french government took the pledge with the Rafale manufacturer to ensure, whatever happens, a minimum annual rate of 11 aircrafts. A rate estimated by the manufacturer as the floor below which it would not be possible to go without calling into question the economy of the program, including the unit cost of these aircrafts. The LPM (Law of Military Planning) not providing matching funds for the purchase of these machines for the years 2013 and 2014, either export allow very opportunely to keep the commitment to the industry, or export is lacking and the french state must find the necessary budgets by reducing or eliminating other programs. Is this commitment based on obtaining export orders a dangerous bet?

Alain Silvy: Let's be honest. This "bet", to use your word, on short-term obtaining of export orders for the Rafale, has nevertheless allowed to complete the LPM allowing the planning of a big hole in the shipment for the Air Force and the Navy without questioning the production rate, already reduced to the minimum industrially acceptable by Dassault Aviation. Deliveries to the French armies should be reduced to only 2 or 3 machines per year for a time, the export bringing the complement to reach the threshold of 11 Rafale produced per year. In case of absence of export order, the situation would become obviously complicated.[…] We would have to find a substantial funding of several hundred million euros. […]

But how to find the hundreds of millions euros in question?

The 3 armies have all benefited from the choice made by the planners of the LPM to reduce to a very low level the Rafale deliveries. The amount saved have been reallocated to the 3 armies. I think nobody questions it. We should have to find the funds by making new balancing within the LPM […] we must now hope that will come very quickly a first export order. […] But export is not neutral. Potential customers, including UAE, have specific requirements with developments leaving the French standards - and therefore with budget not taken into account by the LPM - they want cofinanced by the French state. That could require for France to find further funding for the Rafale program […]

What would be the cost for France of these additional co-development to fund with a potential UAE customer?

One hears everything and its opposite. Everything depends on what one includes. Personally, I do not give precise figures. But this is obviously something like several hundreds of millions of euros paid by the french state.

Is the Air force interested by some of the UAE requirements ?

From my point of view, it depends where. We could be potentially interested by the M88-X with 9 tons of thrust because it would be, in the circumstances, an open field. But, on the other hand, we have not yet reached the stage of maturity - which requires about 150,000 flight hours – with the current M88 with 7.5 tonnes thrust. This means that with the M88-X, even if it should presumptively enjoy a good community with the existing M88, we would have to accumulate even more hours to reach the stage of maturity of the engine.
Very clearly, in my opinion, the M88-X is not for the Air force an immediate need. In order to sell the Rafale to the UAE, the Defense may ultimately be asked to acquire the M88-X in a quantity and on terms still to define. And we'll maybe even happy to use it. But today we have no technical or operational reasons to make it available for us.The gain expected from the arrival of a more powerful engine is lower than the risks we would go with the technical immaturity of new modules and the management in parallel - so complicated in terms of logistics and operational employment of aircraft with different performances –of two relatively different parks of M88. All this must be thorough.

Would it be possible to see Safran manufacturing M88-X for UAE and continue to deliver “classic” M88 for the french Rafale? And this notwithstanding that the french government would have co-funded the development of the M88-X

It is not forbidden to imagine it. On condition, however, that to maintain the parallel production of two versions of M88 does not cost more than producing a single model. The support costs must not explode. Safran must tell us very quickly and very frankly what it would be. And again, nothing force us to equip the whole fleet of Rafale, Air and/or Marine.


And about the UAE demand to have a more powerful RBE2 radar, could it answer to some expectations for the Air force?

The Air Force is interested in having a RBE2 with an active antenna. It is now established with the powerful AESA antenna which will equip our tranche 4 Rafale. What the Emirians are calling for is much more complex. They want, in addition to the AESA, to have new functionalities on their Rafale, such as GMTT / GMTI (detection and tracking of moving ground target), interlacing between air/air and air/ground modes, etc.. Even if this is not for us an urgent need, the operational 'plus' obtained could nonetheless eventually interest us. However, the key Emirian demand is about the range of the RBE2. And, with the same antenna diameter, the only way to achieve the 10% range increase (compared with the Basic AESA F3 "roadmap") that wish to obtain the Emirians, is a big boost to the power of the radar.

But more power to the RBE2, could it be a risk to generate serious electromagnetic interference (EMI) with the SPECTRA receptors ?

There is indeed a very real EMI risk to treat. This is the case whenever we want to change aircraft emission systems. There are solutions, obviously, but this will require to reexamine SPECTRA. But the biggest problem we have identified is about electric generation, which could be insufficient. To increase the maximum range of a few nautical miles, we would have to deeply review the electrical generation system of the aircraft.
In short, to conceive what it could be a Rafale-9, that is to say a new aircraft moving away from the similarity you want with french Rafale. The Emirati experts participating in negotiations are well aware of the problem. But they are also used to have very high quality weapons systems. They want to avoid any regression with the Rafale, at least on the radar range, compared to the F-16 Block 60, the Rafale having also many other qualities. The Emirians don’t have AWACS and therefore want - it is a fundamental requirement - that the Rafale can see very far. Beyond the radar, they are showing fairly strong requirements into SPECTRA development with, for example, the expansion of some frequency bands, an increased sensitivity, adding functionalities; in short, they want we push up the current technologies. Of course, to improve the electronic warfare of our Rafale faster than originally planned could be an additional operational advantage for the Air force. However, our current approach is to consolidate the features implemented in SPECTRA, to make them more robust and make it easier for operators and programmers before wanting to go further into addition of new capabilities. The current SPECTRA is working well and even very good. In sum, what separates us, about Spectra, is a matter of timing and calendar […]. In a more general way, we share the same wishes about capabilities, but with very different maturities calendar sometimes. Budgetary constraints remain a dimensioning factor.


The Emirians want a viewfinder-HMD ...

It's true. And ourselves, one way or another, we will. For various reasons, we agreed in the past to not use it initially, but this equipment is now an almost indispensable element for modern combat aircraft. Besides various prospects of the Rafale - the UAE, Brazil and Switzerland – also want it, confirming this analysis.

In the end, what about the eventuality of a Rafale order by the UAE?

Very sincerely, and seen from my place, I think we're really not very far from being able to reach a common ground with our UAE friends. The only pertinent question to be asked is whether the will of similarity expressed by the Emirians will prevail over their performance requirement If performance is what counts, in fact we’ll get two quite different Rafale - as with the Mirage 2000-9 - because the french state can not or do not want to follow it. If the community is paramount, the Emirians will have to reduce their ambitions with regard to performance. The choice is now in their hands. They must see if their operational necessities allow them or not to settle for a weapon system fairly close to the F3 "roadmap" French standard. They must decide whether they consider more important to work very closely with us. I know they have already expressed the wish, in case of order, to be able to send their pilots very quickly in our Rafale units where they could train, learn the Rafale and our tactical employment. To obtain a rapid operational rise of their own Rafale squadron. in that case their Rafale configuration and ours must not be very different. But it remains to be seen ... That is where we are I think
.
How long would require the additional developments required by the UAE?

It is difficult to answer precisely this question, especially since I do not have all the elements of the problematic. The first UAE aircraft would not be delivered before 2014. This period should be sufficient to finish to develop a 9 tons M-88. About the radar, we would not probably have in 2014 all the capabilities and performance expected, but they would, I think, nevertheless be already very close to the target. The problem of electric generation requires also time to be processed. This will be a heavy operation for the aircraft. In the case of an order signed this year, we would therefore have some years to develop the additional features. These years should not be wasted. In any case, I think the discussions with Emirians take place on a sound footing. Their negotiators are experts who know exactly what is fighter plane and are aware of the state of the art and of various constraints. Talking to people at this level is very pleasant for the Air Force. However, now the order must materialize.


What about the UAE Mirage 2000-9 ?

The French authorities have been very clear on this subject. Once the Rafale ordered by UAE, the Mirage 2000-9 will be taken back by France which will issue them to a defeasance agency in charge of their resale export. This means that in this hypothesis, it is not envisaged that they equip the French Army.

But would it be interesting for the Army because these are recent cells with advanced weapons systems ?

We can not say that we feel no interest in these machines, because their weapons system displays really astonishing performance. The Air Force could certainly benefit. However, the indispensable work for NATO compatibility on these weapons systems would be very heavy with a cost probably exceeding the one - 700 millions euros - planned for the renovation of our Mirage 2000D, which is a priority for us.

If the UAE buy the Rafale, could the Rafale Transformation Squadron (ETR), which will be created in Saint-Dizier, be relocated at Al-Dhafra to help UAE pilots and benefit from the excellent local weather conditions ?

Why not? but we are not there yet. […] To install the ETR – as a whole or just a part - at Al-Dhafra could be an asset. Our first participation, last autumn, to the ATLC (Advanced Tactical Leadership Course) organized by the UAE Air Warfare Center, has once again demonstrated the richness of such exchanges. If the UAE order the Rafale, we may have to quickly take charge, in a way or another, of the transformation of their pilots on our weapon system. Doing it at Al-Dhafra would be - and this is only my opinion - interesting.


Interview by Jean-Louis Prome



العجيب في الامر ان الامارات عندما رفضت الرافال وقامت تبحث عن مقاتلة اخرى قامت فرنسا بتهديدها وربط العلاقات الفرنسية الاماراتية بصفقة الرافال


فرنسا تربط ضمنا بين تعاونها العسكري مع الامارات وصفقة مقاتلات رافال

اعلنت باريس الخميس ان صفقة بيع مقاتلات رافال الفرنسية الى الامارات والتي تتزايد احتمالات فشلها يجب ان تكون على قدم المساواة مع التعاون الاستراتيجي الذي يربطها بابوظبي والذي تكلل في 2009 باقامة قاعدة عسكرية فرنسية.

ويتوجه وزير الخارجية الفرنسي الان جوبيه الى الامارات السبت، في زيارة لم تكن مدرجة سابقا على جدول اعماله، وسيقوم بها فور اختتام زيارته لتركيا التي بدأها الخميس وينهيها الجمعة.

وافاد المتحدث باسم الخارجية الفرنسية برنار فاليرو الخميس ان "رئيس الجمهورية نيكولا ساركوزي عهد الى الان جوبيه مهمة الاشراف على تطوير الشراكة الاستراتيجية الكبرى بين فرنسا والامارات العربية المتحدة، والتي تتضمن طبعا المفاوضات حول مشروع رافال".

وذكر المتحدث الفرنسي بـ"التزام فرنسا امن منطقة الخليج" والذي ترجم خصوصا بافتتاح قاعدة عسكرية فرنسية في ابوظبي في 2009.

واضافة الى الامارات يزور جوبيه كلا من السعودية وقطر والكويت في جولة تبدأ في 19 الجاري وتنتهي في 22 منه.

وشدد فاليرو على ان "فرنسا اختارت تعزيز علاقاتها مع دول الخليج التي هي منذ امد بعيد دول صديقة وحليفة لفرنسا".

وفي الامارات سيشارك جوبيه في حلقة دراسية حول السلام والامن في العالم العربي، وستكون جولته في المنطقة ايضا "مناسبة لاجراء مشاورات حول المسائل الاقليمية: الربيع العربي، الازمة السورية ودعم الدول التي تمر بمرحلة انتقالية".

وتتفاوض ابوظبي في شكل مباشر، من دون عملية استدراج عروض، مع مجموعة داسو الفرنسية المصنعة لمقاتلات رافال منذ العام 2008 لشراء ستين من هذه المقاتلات واستبدال اسطولها من مقاتلات ميراج 2000 الفرنسية التي اشتراها سلاح الجو الاماراتي في مطلع الثمانينات.

ومقاتلة رافال الفرنسية يستخدمها منذ مدة طويلة سلاح الجو الفرنسي ولكنها لم تجد حتى اليوم اي مشتر لها في الخارج. وكانت المفاوضات مع الامارات واعدة جدا بالنسبة الى الفرنسيين.

غير ان الامارات احبطت الاربعاء آمال داسو، باعلانها ان شروط المجموعة الفرنسية "غير تنافسية وغير قابلة للتطبيق العملي"، وبفتحها الباب امام تلقي عروض اخرى من يوروفايتر الاوروبية وبوينغ الاميركية.

واعلن التحالف الاوروبي المصنع لمقاتلات يوروفايتر الاحد ان ابوظبي طلبت منه تقديم عرض مضاد لعرض داسو، ما شكل صدمة لامال الصانع الفرنسي.

ولكن وزير الدفاع الفرنسي جيرار لونغيه رفض الخميس الاستسلام لاحتمال تخلي ابوظبي عن شراء المقاتلة الفرنسية


:baaa2::baaa2:​

​

أنقر للتوسيع...

they want, in addition to the aesa, to have new functionalities on their rafale, such as gmtt / gmti (detection and tracking of moving ground

أنقر للتوسيع...

eurofighter typhoon قال:

السطوهـ السعوديه

أنقر للتوسيع...

berkut_su قال:

حقيقة كلام الخبير صحيح وواقعي وهو لم يدخل الى تفاصيل فنية لانه في برنامج محدود الوقت اعتقد لكن فعليا الرافال تعاني من مشاكل كثيرة


[----------هذه ليست كل المصادر ...هناك اكثر عن مشاكل الحرارة والتصميم واليزر الخ ...........لكن اقرا جيدا عن المشاكل الرئيسية وهي المحرك -الرادر -السعر وغيرها

awaiting the uae
dsi special edition , august 2010


with the general alain silvy
deputy chief plans within the staff of the air force.

The french government took the pledge with the rafale manufacturer to ensure, whatever happens, a minimum annual rate of 11 aircrafts. A rate estimated by the manufacturer as the floor below which it would not be possible to go without calling into question the economy of the program, including the unit cost of these aircrafts. The lpm (law of military planning) not providing matching funds for the purchase of these machines for the years 2013 and 2014, either export allow very opportunely to keep the commitment to the industry, or export is lacking and the french state must find the necessary budgets by reducing or eliminating other programs. Is this commitment based on obtaining export orders a dangerous bet?

Alain silvy: Let's be honest. This "bet", to use your word, on short-term obtaining of export orders for the rafale, has nevertheless allowed to complete the lpm allowing the planning of a big hole in the shipment for the air force and the navy without questioning the production rate, already reduced to the minimum industrially acceptable by dassault aviation. Deliveries to the french armies should be reduced to only 2 or 3 machines per year for a time, the export bringing the complement to reach the threshold of 11 rafale produced per year. In case of absence of export order, the situation would become obviously complicated.[…] we would have to find a substantial funding of several hundred million euros. […]

but how to find the hundreds of millions euros in question?

The 3 armies have all benefited from the choice made by the planners of the lpm to reduce to a very low level the rafale deliveries. The amount saved have been reallocated to the 3 armies. I think nobody questions it. We should have to find the funds by making new balancing within the lpm […] we must now hope that will come very quickly a first export order. […] but export is not neutral. Potential customers, including uae, have specific requirements with developments leaving the french standards - and therefore with budget not taken into account by the lpm - they want cofinanced by the french state. That could require for france to find further funding for the rafale program […]

what would be the cost for france of these additional co-development to fund with a potential uae customer?

One hears everything and its opposite. Everything depends on what one includes. Personally, i do not give precise figures. But this is obviously something like several hundreds of millions of euros paid by the french state.

Is the air force interested by some of the uae requirements ?

From my point of view, it depends where. We could be potentially interested by the m88-x with 9 tons of thrust because it would be, in the circumstances, an open field. But, on the other hand, we have not yet reached the stage of maturity - which requires about 150,000 flight hours – with the current m88 with 7.5 tonnes thrust. This means that with the m88-x, even if it should presumptively enjoy a good community with the existing m88, we would have to accumulate even more hours to reach the stage of maturity of the engine.
Very clearly, in my opinion, the m88-x is not for the air force an immediate need. In order to sell the rafale to the uae, the defense may ultimately be asked to acquire the m88-x in a quantity and on terms still to define. And we'll maybe even happy to use it. But today we have no technical or operational reasons to make it available for us.the gain expected from the arrival of a more powerful engine is lower than the risks we would go with the technical immaturity of new modules and the management in parallel - so complicated in terms of logistics and operational employment of aircraft with different performances –of two relatively different parks of m88. All this must be thorough.

Would it be possible to see safran manufacturing m88-x for uae and continue to deliver “classic” m88 for the french rafale? And this notwithstanding that the french government would have co-funded the development of the m88-x

it is not forbidden to imagine it. On condition, however, that to maintain the parallel production of two versions of m88 does not cost more than producing a single model. The support costs must not explode. Safran must tell us very quickly and very frankly what it would be. And again, nothing force us to equip the whole fleet of rafale, air and/or marine.


And about the uae demand to have a more powerful rbe2 radar, could it answer to some expectations for the air force?

The air force is interested in having a rbe2 with an active antenna. It is now established with the powerful aesa antenna which will equip our tranche 4 rafale. What the emirians are calling for is much more complex. They want, in addition to the aesa, to have new functionalities on their rafale, such as gmtt / gmti (detection and tracking of moving ground target), interlacing between air/air and air/ground modes, etc.. Even if this is not for us an urgent need, the operational 'plus' obtained could nonetheless eventually interest us. However, the key emirian demand is about the range of the rbe2. And, with the same antenna diameter, the only way to achieve the 10% range increase (compared with the basic aesa f3 "roadmap") that wish to obtain the emirians, is a big boost to the power of the radar.

But more power to the rbe2, could it be a risk to generate serious electromagnetic interference (emi) with the spectra receptors ?

There is indeed a very real emi risk to treat. This is the case whenever we want to change aircraft emission systems. There are solutions, obviously, but this will require to reexamine spectra. But the biggest problem we have identified is about electric generation, which could be insufficient. To increase the maximum range of a few nautical miles, we would have to deeply review the electrical generation system of the aircraft.
In short, to conceive what it could be a rafale-9, that is to say a new aircraft moving away from the similarity you want with french rafale. The emirati experts participating in negotiations are well aware of the problem. But they are also used to have very high quality weapons systems. They want to avoid any regression with the rafale, at least on the radar range, compared to the f-16 block 60, the rafale having also many other qualities. The emirians don’t have awacs and therefore want - it is a fundamental requirement - that the rafale can see very far. Beyond the radar, they are showing fairly strong requirements into spectra development with, for example, the expansion of some frequency bands, an increased sensitivity, adding functionalities; in short, they want we push up the current technologies. Of course, to improve the electronic warfare of our rafale faster than originally planned could be an additional operational advantage for the air force. However, our current approach is to consolidate the features implemented in spectra, to make them more robust and make it easier for operators and programmers before wanting to go further into addition of new capabilities. The current spectra is working well and even very good. In sum, what separates us, about spectra, is a matter of timing and calendar […]. In a more general way, we share the same wishes about capabilities, but with very different maturities calendar sometimes. Budgetary constraints remain a dimensioning factor.


The emirians want a viewfinder-hmd ...

It's true. And ourselves, one way or another, we will. For various reasons, we agreed in the past to not use it initially, but this equipment is now an almost indispensable element for modern combat aircraft. Besides various prospects of the rafale - the uae, brazil and switzerland – also want it, confirming this analysis.

In the end, what about the eventuality of a rafale order by the uae?

Very sincerely, and seen from my place, i think we're really not very far from being able to reach a common ground with our uae friends. The only pertinent question to be asked is whether the will of similarity expressed by the emirians will prevail over their performance requirement if performance is what counts, in fact we’ll get two quite different rafale - as with the mirage 2000-9 - because the french state can not or do not want to follow it. If the community is paramount, the emirians will have to reduce their ambitions with regard to performance. The choice is now in their hands. They must see if their operational necessities allow them or not to settle for a weapon system fairly close to the f3 "roadmap" french standard. They must decide whether they consider more important to work very closely with us. I know they have already expressed the wish, in case of order, to be able to send their pilots very quickly in our rafale units where they could train, learn the rafale and our tactical employment. To obtain a rapid operational rise of their own rafale squadron. In that case their rafale configuration and ours must not be very different. But it remains to be seen ... That is where we are i think
.
How long would require the additional developments required by the uae?

It is difficult to answer precisely this question, especially since i do not have all the elements of the problematic. The first uae aircraft would not be delivered before 2014. This period should be sufficient to finish to develop a 9 tons m-88. About the radar, we would not probably have in 2014 all the capabilities and performance expected, but they would, i think, nevertheless be already very close to the target. The problem of electric generation requires also time to be processed. This will be a heavy operation for the aircraft. In the case of an order signed this year, we would therefore have some years to develop the additional features. These years should not be wasted. In any case, i think the discussions with emirians take place on a sound footing. Their negotiators are experts who know exactly what is fighter plane and are aware of the state of the art and of various constraints. Talking to people at this level is very pleasant for the air force. However, now the order must materialize.


What about the uae mirage 2000-9 ?

The french authorities have been very clear on this subject. Once the rafale ordered by uae, the mirage 2000-9 will be taken back by france which will issue them to a defeasance agency in charge of their resale export. This means that in this hypothesis, it is not envisaged that they equip the french army.

But would it be interesting for the army because these are recent cells with advanced weapons systems ?

We can not say that we feel no interest in these machines, because their weapons system displays really astonishing performance. The air force could certainly benefit. However, the indispensable work for nato compatibility on these weapons systems would be very heavy with a cost probably exceeding the one - 700 millions euros - planned for the renovation of our mirage 2000d, which is a priority for us.

If the uae buy the rafale, could the rafale transformation squadron (etr), which will be created in saint-dizier, be relocated at al-dhafra to help uae pilots and benefit from the excellent local weather conditions ?

Why not? But we are not there yet. […] to install the etr – as a whole or just a part - at al-dhafra could be an asset. Our first participation, last autumn, to the atlc (advanced tactical leadership course) organized by the uae air warfare center, has once again demonstrated the richness of such exchanges. If the uae order the rafale, we may have to quickly take charge, in a way or another, of the transformation of their pilots on our weapon system. Doing it at al-dhafra would be - and this is only my opinion - interesting.

Interview by jean-louis prome

أنقر للتوسيع...